Mary Morley

409 total citations
34 papers, 272 citations indexed

About

Mary Morley is a scholar working on Occupational Therapy, General Health Professions and Psychiatry and Mental health. According to data from OpenAlex, Mary Morley has authored 34 papers receiving a total of 272 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 28 papers in Occupational Therapy, 15 papers in General Health Professions and 7 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health. Recurrent topics in Mary Morley's work include Occupational Therapy Practice and Research (28 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (7 papers) and Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (6 papers). Mary Morley is often cited by papers focused on Occupational Therapy Practice and Research (28 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (7 papers) and Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (6 papers). Mary Morley collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Mary Morley's co-authors include Nicola J. Petty, Sue Rugg, Kirsty Forsyth, Gary Kielhofner, Renée R. Taylor, Jane Melton, Anita Atwal, Chia-Wei Fan, Georgia Spiliotopoulou and Donald Maciver and has published in prestigious journals such as British Journal of Occupational Therapy, OTJR Occupational Therapy Journal of Research and Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy.

In The Last Decade

Mary Morley

32 papers receiving 240 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mary Morley United Kingdom 11 161 118 57 46 30 34 272
Auldeen Alsop United Kingdom 11 212 1.3× 147 1.2× 56 1.0× 99 2.2× 32 1.1× 26 370
Ann Bossers Canada 11 196 1.2× 155 1.3× 43 0.8× 110 2.4× 30 1.0× 21 387
Bonny Jung Canada 12 118 0.7× 122 1.0× 44 0.8× 96 2.1× 18 0.6× 28 336
Kathleen Barker Schwartz United States 9 74 0.5× 58 0.5× 22 0.4× 40 0.9× 15 0.5× 17 211
Cate Fitzgerald Australia 12 170 1.1× 221 1.9× 40 0.7× 182 4.0× 15 0.5× 14 384
Simona Hvalič‐Touzery Slovenia 9 23 0.1× 193 1.6× 45 0.8× 73 1.6× 20 0.7× 33 333
Daleen Casteleijn South Africa 8 52 0.3× 60 0.5× 35 0.6× 24 0.5× 37 1.2× 46 212
Rosita Saupe Brazil 9 48 0.3× 198 1.7× 29 0.5× 31 0.7× 30 1.0× 36 296
José Maria Ximenes Guimarães Brazil 11 52 0.3× 158 1.3× 14 0.2× 21 0.5× 54 1.8× 42 244
Donizete Vago Daher Brazil 10 40 0.2× 174 1.5× 13 0.2× 39 0.8× 20 0.7× 66 290

Countries citing papers authored by Mary Morley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mary Morley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary Morley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary Morley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mary Morley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary Morley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary Morley. The network helps show where Mary Morley may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mary Morley

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mary Morley. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mary Morley based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mary Morley. Mary Morley is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Fan, Chia-Wei, et al.. (2016). Examining changes in occupational participation in forensic patients using the Model of Human Occupation Screening Tool. British Journal of Occupational Therapy. 79(12). 727–733. 8 indexed citations
2.
Maciver, Donald, et al.. (2015). A Rasch analysis of the model of human occupation screening tool single observation form (MOHOST-SOF) in mental health. British Journal of Occupational Therapy. 79(1). 49–56. 6 indexed citations
3.
Morley, Mary. (2014). Evidencing What Works: Are Occupational Therapists Using Clinical Information Effectively?. British Journal of Occupational Therapy. 77(12). 601–604. 2 indexed citations
4.
Morley, Mary, et al.. (2013). Confidence in leadership among the newly qualified.. PubMed. 109(42). 15–6. 2 indexed citations
5.
Miles, Helen & Mary Morley. (2013). Developing Mental Health Occupational Therapy Practice to Meet the Needs of People with Mental Health Problems and Physical Disability. British Journal of Occupational Therapy. 76(12). 556–559.
6.
Morley, Mary, et al.. (2013). Making Supervision and Ongoing Development Review a Productive Experience: An Integrated Approach. British Journal of Occupational Therapy. 76(5). 246–248. 2 indexed citations
7.
Kielhofner, Gary, et al.. (2012). Impact of using the Model of Human Occupation: A survey of occupational therapy mental health practitioners' perceptions. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy. 19(5). 450–456. 24 indexed citations
8.
Forsyth, Kirsty, et al.. (2012). Mental Health Payment-by-Results Clusters and the Model of Human Occupation Screening Tool. OTJR Occupational Therapy Journal of Research. 33(1). 40–49. 3 indexed citations
9.
Morley, Mary, et al.. (2011). Marketing Occupational Therapy: Everybody's Business. British Journal of Occupational Therapy. 74(8). 406–408. 5 indexed citations
10.
Morley, Mary, et al.. (2011). The Development of Care Pathways and Packages in Mental Health Based on the Model of Human Occupation Screening Tool. British Journal of Occupational Therapy. 74(6). 284–294. 15 indexed citations
11.
Morley, Mary, Anita Atwal, & Georgia Spiliotopoulou. (2011). Has Occupational Science Taken Away the Occupational Therapy Evidence Base? A Debate. British Journal of Occupational Therapy. 74(10). 494–497. 7 indexed citations
12.
Kielhofner, Gary, et al.. (2010). A Psychometric Study of the Model of Human Occupation Screening Tool (MOHOST). Hong Kong Journal of Occupational Therapy. 20(2). 63–70. 11 indexed citations
13.
Morley, Mary, et al.. (2009). Trust: Can Occupational Therapists Take it for Granted?. British Journal of Occupational Therapy. 72(10). 466–468. 1 indexed citations
14.
Morley, Mary. (2009). Contextual Factors That Have an Impact on the Transitional Experience of Newly Qualified Occupational Therapists. British Journal of Occupational Therapy. 72(11). 507–514. 23 indexed citations
15.
Cameron, Josh & Mary Morley. (2007). NHS Jobs Shortage: Challenges for Government, Practice and Education. British Journal of Occupational Therapy. 70(9). 371–371. 2 indexed citations
16.
Morley, Mary. (2007). Building Reflective Practice through Preceptorship: The Cycles of Professional Growth. British Journal of Occupational Therapy. 70(1). 40–42. 5 indexed citations
17.
Morley, Mary. (2006). Moving from Student to New Practitioner: The Transitional Experience. British Journal of Occupational Therapy. 69(5). 231–233. 16 indexed citations
18.
Morley, Mary, et al.. (1993). Taming the Electronic Jungle: Electronic Information: the Collection Management Issues. OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique). 4 indexed citations
19.
Morley, Mary, et al.. (1991). Collection management in academic libraries. Gower eBooks. 18 indexed citations
20.
Morley, Mary. (1987). The National Acquisitions Group. Program electronic library and information systems. 21(1). 56–58. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Auldeen Alsop Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ann Bossers Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Bonny Jung Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Kathleen Barker Schwartz Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Cate Fitzgerald Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Simona Hvalič‐Touzery Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Daleen Casteleijn Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Rosita Saupe Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by José Maria Ximenes Guimarães Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Donizete Vago Daher
Rankless by CCL
2026