Julia Vera Pescheny

575 total citations · 1 hit paper
9 papers, 375 citations indexed

About

Julia Vera Pescheny is a scholar working on Conservation, General Health Professions and Education. According to data from OpenAlex, Julia Vera Pescheny has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 375 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Conservation, 4 papers in General Health Professions and 4 papers in Education. Recurrent topics in Julia Vera Pescheny's work include Art Therapy and Mental Health (8 papers), Psychodrama and Leishmaniasis Studies (4 papers) and Occupational Therapy Practice and Research (3 papers). Julia Vera Pescheny is often cited by papers focused on Art Therapy and Mental Health (8 papers), Psychodrama and Leishmaniasis Studies (4 papers) and Occupational Therapy Practice and Research (3 papers). Julia Vera Pescheny collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Julia Vera Pescheny's co-authors include Yannis Pappas, Gurch Randhawa, Laura H. Gunn and Angel Chater and has published in prestigious journals such as International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, BMJ Open and BMC Health Services Research.

In The Last Decade

Julia Vera Pescheny

9 papers receiving 373 citations

Hit Papers

Facilitators and barriers... 2018 2026 2020 2023 2018 40 80 120

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Julia Vera Pescheny United Kingdom 6 267 182 143 118 71 9 375
Mel Steer United Kingdom 5 226 0.8× 163 0.9× 133 0.9× 101 0.9× 45 0.6× 8 327
Tamsin Thomas Australia 12 47 0.2× 197 1.1× 26 0.2× 33 0.3× 17 0.2× 18 330
Elaine Moody Canada 9 39 0.1× 168 0.9× 9 0.1× 10 0.1× 35 0.5× 41 302
Magnus Zingmark Sweden 11 4 0.0× 139 0.8× 55 0.4× 7 0.1× 19 0.3× 41 279
Heather A. Cooke Canada 8 6 0.0× 237 1.3× 6 0.0× 14 0.1× 10 0.1× 20 311
Simon Burrow United Kingdom 9 5 0.0× 232 1.3× 11 0.1× 14 0.1× 6 0.1× 16 350
Linda Grabbe United States 10 7 0.0× 148 0.8× 5 0.0× 4 0.0× 50 0.7× 21 373
Samantha Bonney United Kingdom 4 6 0.0× 138 0.8× 5 0.0× 14 0.1× 41 0.6× 6 224
José Maria Ximenes Guimarães Brazil 11 2 0.0× 158 0.9× 52 0.4× 50 0.4× 10 0.1× 42 244

Countries citing papers authored by Julia Vera Pescheny

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Vera Pescheny's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Vera Pescheny with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Vera Pescheny more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Vera Pescheny

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Vera Pescheny. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Vera Pescheny. The network helps show where Julia Vera Pescheny may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Julia Vera Pescheny

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Julia Vera Pescheny. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Julia Vera Pescheny based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Julia Vera Pescheny. Julia Vera Pescheny is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Chater, Angel, et al.. (2022). Understanding the Experience of Service Users in an Integrated Care Programme for Obesity and Mental Health: A Qualitative Investigation of Total Wellbeing Luton. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 19(2). 817–817. 1 indexed citations
2.
Pescheny, Julia Vera, Laura H. Gunn, Gurch Randhawa, & Yannis Pappas. (2019). The impact of the Luton social prescribing programme on energy expenditure: a quantitative before-and-after study. BMJ Open. 9(6). e026862–e026862. 32 indexed citations
3.
Pescheny, Julia Vera, Laura H. Gunn, Yannis Pappas, & Gurch Randhawa. (2019). The impact of the Luton social prescribing programme on mental well-being: a quantitative before-and-after study. Journal of Public Health. 43(1). e69–e76. 19 indexed citations
4.
Pescheny, Julia Vera, Gurch Randhawa, & Yannis Pappas. (2019). The impact of social prescribing services on service users: a systematic review of the evidence. European Journal of Public Health. 30(4). 664–673. 105 indexed citations
5.
Pescheny, Julia Vera, Yannis Pappas, & Gurch Randhawa. (2018). Evaluating the Implementation and Delivery of a Social Prescribing Intervention: A Research Protocol. International Journal of Integrated Care. 18(1). 13–13. 12 indexed citations
6.
Pescheny, Julia Vera, Yannis Pappas, & Gurch Randhawa. (2018). Facilitators and barriers of implementing and delivering social prescribing services: a systematic review. BMC Health Services Research. 18(1). 86–86. 147 indexed citations breakdown →
7.
Pescheny, Julia Vera, Yannis Pappas, & Gurch Randhawa. (2018). Service user outcomes of a social prescribing programme in general practice. International Journal of Integrated Care. 18(s2). 215–215. 3 indexed citations
8.
Pescheny, Julia Vera, Gurch Randhawa, & Yannis Pappas. (2018). Patient uptake and adherence to social prescribing: a qualitative study. BJGP Open. 2(3). bjgpopen18X101598–bjgpopen18X101598. 55 indexed citations
9.
Pescheny, Julia Vera, Yannis Pappas, & Gurch Randhawa. (2018). Social Prescribing: Primary care patient and service user engagement. International Journal of Integrated Care. 18(s2). 19–19. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026