Meghan Midgley
- Plant Science top 2%
- Soil Science top 2%
- Insect Science top 1%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 2%
- Ecology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Richard P. PhillipsEdward BrzostekTanya E. CheekePetra FranssonAnna RoslingHéctor UrbinaElsa C. AndersonEmily S. Minor
- Topics
- Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (9 papers)Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (9 papers)Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSwedenCanada
In The Last Decade
Meghan Midgley
16 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
- Plant Science 858
- Soil Science 589
- Insect Science 506
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 463
- Ecology 218
Countries citing papers authored by Meghan Midgley
This map shows the geographic impact of Meghan Midgley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Meghan Midgley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Meghan Midgley more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Meghan Midgley
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Meghan Midgley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Meghan Midgley. The network helps show where Meghan Midgley may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Meghan Midgley
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Meghan Midgley. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Meghan Midgley based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Meghan Midgley. Meghan Midgley is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 18 | |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 21 | |
| 10 | 19 | |
| 11 | 62 | |
| 12 | 126 | |
| 13 | 89 | |
| 14 | Microbial limitation in a changing world: A stoichiometric approach for predicting microbial resource limitation and fluxes | 1 |
| 15 | The mycorrhizal‐associated nutrient economy: a new framework for predicting carbon–nutrient couplings in temperate forestsbreakdown → | 775 |
| 16 | 62 |
About Meghan Midgley
Meghan Midgley is a scholar working on Soil Science, Insect Science and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 16 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (9 papers), Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (9 papers) and Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Soil Science (589 citations), Insect Science (506 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (463 citations). Meghan Midgley has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Sweden and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Richard P. Phillips, Edward Brzostek, Tanya E. Cheeke, Petra Fransson, Anna Rosling, Héctor Urbina, Elsa C. Anderson, Emily S. Minor, R. Phillips and Ray Dybzinski. Their work appears in journals such as Ecology, New Phytologist and Soil Biology and Biochemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.