Mark G. St. John

1.8k total citations
17 papers, 906 citations indexed

About

Mark G. St. John is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Insect Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark G. St. John has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 906 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 9 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and 7 papers in Insect Science. Recurrent topics in Mark G. St. John's work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (9 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (5 papers) and Plant and animal studies (4 papers). Mark G. St. John is often cited by papers focused on Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (9 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (5 papers) and Plant and animal studies (4 papers). Mark G. St. John collaborates with scholars based in New Zealand, Canada and United Kingdom. Mark G. St. John's co-authors include Ian A. Dickie, Kate H. Orwin, Miko U. F. Kirschbaum, Valerie M. Behan‐Pelletier, Diana H. Wall, G. W. Yeates, Karen I. Bonner, Duane A. Peltzer, Chris W. Morse and Peter J. Bellingham and has published in prestigious journals such as Ecology, Ecology Letters and Soil Biology and Biochemistry.

In The Last Decade

Mark G. St. John

17 papers receiving 884 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mark G. St. John New Zealand 13 403 371 312 297 261 17 906
Annik Schnitzler France 19 455 1.1× 420 1.1× 401 1.3× 207 0.7× 176 0.7× 48 1.1k
Markus Wagner United Kingdom 17 417 1.0× 475 1.3× 297 1.0× 137 0.5× 316 1.2× 35 970
Ilona Leyer Germany 19 357 0.9× 296 0.8× 450 1.4× 128 0.4× 145 0.6× 38 857
Jonathan H. Titus United States 18 523 1.3× 431 1.2× 390 1.3× 114 0.4× 253 1.0× 34 963
G. J. Masters United Kingdom 11 408 1.0× 447 1.2× 222 0.7× 270 0.9× 371 1.4× 17 855
Karen Haubensak United States 14 383 1.0× 339 0.9× 221 0.7× 101 0.3× 209 0.8× 31 694
Manfred Türke Germany 18 371 0.9× 273 0.7× 292 0.9× 302 1.0× 370 1.4× 36 890
Christopher M. Sthultz United States 11 486 1.2× 517 1.4× 225 0.7× 227 0.8× 266 1.0× 11 1.0k
Laura A. Hyatt United States 12 662 1.6× 382 1.0× 360 1.2× 121 0.4× 353 1.4× 18 993
Alexander C.W. Sabais Germany 13 432 1.1× 403 1.1× 351 1.1× 128 0.4× 328 1.3× 13 1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Mark G. St. John

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark G. St. John's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark G. St. John with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark G. St. John more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark G. St. John

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark G. St. John. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark G. St. John. The network helps show where Mark G. St. John may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark G. St. John

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark G. St. John. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark G. St. John based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark G. St. John. Mark G. St. John is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
1.
Allen, Kara, Peter J. Bellingham, Sarah J. Richardson, et al.. (2023). Long‐term exclusion of invasive ungulates alters tree recruitment and functional traits but not total forest carbon. Ecological Applications. 33(4). e2836–e2836. 12 indexed citations
2.
Peralta, Guadalupe, Nicole L. Schon, Ian A. Dickie, et al.. (2019). Contrasting responses of soil nematode communities to native and non-native woody plant expansion. Oecologia. 190(4). 891–899. 9 indexed citations
3.
Orwin, Kate H., David A. Wardle, David R. Towns, et al.. (2015). Burrowing seabird effects on invertebrate communities in soil and litter are dominated by ecosystem engineering rather than nutrient addition. Oecologia. 180(1). 217–230. 24 indexed citations
4.
Ramirez, Kelly S., Markus Döring, Nico Eisenhauer, et al.. (2015). Toward a global platform for linking soil biodiversity data. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution. 3. 23 indexed citations
5.
Dickie, Ian A., Mark G. St. John, G. W. Yeates, et al.. (2014). Belowground legacies of Pinus contorta invasion and removal result in multiple mechanisms of invasional meltdown. AoB Plants. 6. 88 indexed citations
6.
Kardol, Paul, Ian A. Dickie, Mark G. St. John, et al.. (2014). Soil‐mediated effects of invasive ungulates on native tree seedlings. Journal of Ecology. 102(3). 622–631. 56 indexed citations
7.
John, Mark G. St., Peter J. Bellingham, Lawrence R. Walker, et al.. (2012). Loss of a dominant nitrogen‐fixing shrub in primary succession: consequences for plant and below‐ground communities. Journal of Ecology. 100(5). 1074–1084. 27 indexed citations
8.
Richardson, Sarah J., Peter A. Williams, Norman W. H. Mason, et al.. (2012). Rare species drive local trait diversity in two geographically disjunct examples of a naturally rare alpine ecosystem in New Zealand. Journal of Vegetation Science. 23(4). 626–639. 24 indexed citations
9.
Orwin, Kate H., Miko U. F. Kirschbaum, Mark G. St. John, & Ian A. Dickie. (2011). Organic nutrient uptake by mycorrhizal fungi enhances ecosystem carbon storage: a model-based assessment. Ecology Letters. 14(5). 493–502. 295 indexed citations
10.
Dickie, Ian A., G. W. Yeates, Mark G. St. John, et al.. (2011). Ecosystem service and biodiversity trade-offs in two woody successions. Journal of Applied Ecology. 48(4). 926–934. 98 indexed citations
11.
John, Mark G. St., Kate H. Orwin, & Ian A. Dickie. (2011). No ‘home’ versus ‘away’ effects of decomposition found in a grassland–forest reciprocal litter transplant study. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 43(7). 1482–1489. 90 indexed citations
12.
Behan‐Pelletier, Valerie M., Mark G. St. John, & Neville Winchester. (2007). Canopy Oribatida: Tree specific or microhabitat specific?. European Journal of Soil Biology. 44(2). 220–224. 19 indexed citations
13.
John, Mark G. St., Diana H. Wall, & Valerie M. Behan‐Pelletier. (2006). DOES PLANT SPECIES CO-OCCURRENCE INFLUENCE SOIL MITE DIVERSITY?. Ecology. 87(3). 625–633. 50 indexed citations
14.
John, Mark G. St., Diana H. Wall, & H. W. Hunt. (2006). ARE SOIL MITE ASSEMBLAGES STRUCTURED BY THE IDENTITY OF NATIVE AND INVASIVE ALIEN GRASSES?. Ecology. 87(5). 1314–1324. 28 indexed citations
15.
John, Mark G. St., Giuseppe Bagatto, Valerie M. Behan‐Pelletier, et al.. (2002). Mite (Acari) colonization of vegetated mine tailings near Sudbury, Ontario, Canada. Plant and Soil. 245(2). 295–305. 43 indexed citations
16.
John, Mark G. St. & Joseph D. Shorthouse. (2000). ALLOCATION PATTERNS OF ORGANIC NITROGEN AND MINERAL NUTRIENTS WITHIN STEM GALLS OFDIPLOLEPIS SPINOSAANDDIPLOLEPIS TRIFORMA(HYMENOPTERA: CYNIPIDAE) ON WILD ROSES (ROSACEAE). The Canadian Entomologist. 132(5). 635–648. 12 indexed citations
17.
John, Mark G. St., et al.. (1981). ANALYSIS OF FIRM WATER SUPPLY UNDER COMPLEX INSTITUTIONAL CONSTRAINTS1. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association. 17(3). 373–379. 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026