Meg Young

20 papers receiving 559 citations

Peers

Meg Young
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Health Informatics 43
  • Safety Research 233
  • Human-Computer Interaction 138
  • Computer Science Applications 82
  • Business and International Management 10
Replace Naja Holten Møller with:
Naja Holten Møller Denmark
Isabella Seeber Austria
Catherine Flick United Kingdom
Mark Bilandzic Australia
Alexander Benedikt Merz Austria
Anastasia Sergeeva Netherlands
Stefano De Paoli United Kingdom
Aarni Tuomi Finland
Louis Hickman United States
Rowena Rodrigues United Kingdom
Meg Young relative to Naja Holten Møller Denmark Naja Holten Møller's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.5×
Naja Holten Møller · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Meg Young

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Meg Young's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Meg Young with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Meg Young more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Meg Young

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Meg Young. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Meg Young. The network helps show where Meg Young may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Meg Young, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Meg Young Line = papers co-authored together Meg Young links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016156
2 202085
3 202058
4 202150
5 202235
6 201933
7 201931
8 201927
9 200824
10 201013
11 201713
12 201510
13 202110
14 20249
15 20248
16 20206
17 20195
18 20224
19 20251
20 20251

About Meg Young

Meg Young is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Safety Research, Human-Computer Interaction, Information Systems and Computer Science Applications, having authored 21 papers that have together received 579 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (8 papers), Privacy, Security, and Data Protection (5 papers), COVID-19 Digital Contact Tracing (3 papers), Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing (3 papers), Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (3 papers), Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data (2 papers), Literacy, Media, and Education (1 paper) and Social Media and Politics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (43 citations), Safety Research (233 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (138 citations), Computer Science Applications (82 citations) and Business and International Management (10 citations). Meg Young has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Albania. Frequent co-authors include P. M. Krafft, Michael Katell, Steven J. Jackson, Syed Ishtiaque Ahmed, Daniela K. Rosner, Laewoo Kang, Lara Houston, Dharma Dailey, Karen Huang and Batya Friedman. Their work appears in journals such as First Monday, Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Journal of Food Science, Journal of Transport & Health and Ethics and Information Technology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact