Meg D. Bishop

22 papers receiving 422 citations

Peers

Meg D. Bishop
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • Social Psychology 335
  • Gender Studies 128
  • Reproductive Medicine 69
  • Clinical Psychology 104
  • General Health Professions 84
Replace Gabriel R. Murchison with:
Gabriel R. Murchison United States
Athena D. F. Sherman United States
Kyle Tan New Zealand
Gabriël van Beusekom Netherlands
Michael P. Dentato United States
Dani E. Rosenkrantz United States
Joshua A. Rusow United States
Marina Carman Australia
Colleen Poon Canada
Deborah S. Levine United States
Meg D. Bishop relative to Gabriel R. Murchison United States Gabriel R. Murchison's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Gabriel R. Murchison · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Meg D. Bishop

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Meg D. Bishop's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Meg D. Bishop with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Meg D. Bishop more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Meg D. Bishop

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Meg D. Bishop. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Meg D. Bishop. The network helps show where Meg D. Bishop may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Meg D. Bishop, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Meg D. Bishop Line = papers co-authored together Meg D. Bishop links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020106
2 202156
3 202037
4 202036
5 202133
6 201930
7 202326
8 202117
9 202117
10 202215
11 202014
12 202114
13 20239
14 20206
15 20235
16 20244
17 20243
18 20232
19 20242
20 20242

About Meg D. Bishop

Meg D. Bishop is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions and Reproductive Medicine, having authored 24 papers that have together received 437 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (21 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (9 papers), African Sexualities and LGBTQ+ Issues (7 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (5 papers), Gender Roles and Identity Studies (4 papers), Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (3 papers), Social Media and Politics (2 papers) and Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (335 citations), Gender Studies (128 citations), Reproductive Medicine (69 citations), Clinical Psychology (104 citations) and General Health Professions (84 citations). Meg D. Bishop has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Belgium and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Stephen T. Russell, Jessica N. Fish, Phillip L. Hammack, Salvatore Ioverno, Allen B. Mallory, Evan A. Krueger, Alexander Martos, Bianca D. M. Wilson, Marguerita Lightfoot and Sanjana Pampati. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Adolescent Health, Developmental Psychology, Prevention Science, Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity and The Journal of Sex Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact