M.E. Mulet

516 citations
13 papers · 371 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

M.E. Mulet

13 papers receiving 325 citations

Peers

M.E. Mulet
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • Ophthalmology 243
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 282
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 90
  • Epidemiology 94
  • Clinical Biochemistry 16
Replace Mae-Lynn Catherine Bastion with:
Mae-Lynn Catherine Bastion Malaysia
Sinan Emre Türkiye
Yongzhen Bao China
Mariaelena Filippelli Italy
Henrik Sejersen Denmark
Beata Urban Poland
Shui-Mei Lee Taiwan
Erkan Çelik Türkiye
Hyung Bin Hwang South Korea
Eylem Yaman Pınarcı Türkiye
M.E. Mulet relative to Mae-Lynn Catherine Bastion Malaysia Mae-Lynn Catherine Bastion's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Mae-Lynn Catherine Bastion · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M.E. Mulet

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M.E. Mulet's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M.E. Mulet with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M.E. Mulet more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M.E. Mulet

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M.E. Mulet. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M.E. Mulet. The network helps show where M.E. Mulet may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside M.E. Mulet, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M.E. Mulet Line = papers co-authored together M.E. Mulet links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 200966
2 200264
3 199546
4 199533
5 200832
6 200530
7 201024
8 200522
9 200315
10 200413
11 200612
12 200510
13 19944

About M.E. Mulet

M.E. Mulet is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Ophthalmology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Epidemiology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 371 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Corneal surgery and disorders (9 papers), Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (6 papers), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (6 papers), Corneal Surgery and Treatments (4 papers), Ocular Infections and Treatments (4 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (2 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (2 papers) and Photodynamic Therapy Research Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (243 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (282 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (90 citations), Epidemiology (94 citations) and Clinical Biochemistry (16 citations). M.E. Mulet has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, Germany and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Jorge L. Alió, María José Ayala, Michael C. Knorz, Ahmed Galal, Juan M. Ruíz, J.L. Bellot, Fernando de la Hoz, Ramón Gutiérrez-Ortega, Aida Serra and Consuelo Ferrer. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Refractive Surgery, Ophthalmology, Cornea, Ophthalmic Research and American Journal of Ophthalmology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact