M.E. Einstein

1.8k total citations
58 papers, 1.4k citations indexed

About

M.E. Einstein is a scholar working on Animal Science and Zoology, Small Animals and Genetics. According to data from OpenAlex, M.E. Einstein has authored 58 papers receiving a total of 1.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 49 papers in Animal Science and Zoology, 34 papers in Small Animals and 20 papers in Genetics. Recurrent topics in M.E. Einstein's work include Animal Nutrition and Physiology (40 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (34 papers) and Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (20 papers). M.E. Einstein is often cited by papers focused on Animal Nutrition and Physiology (40 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (34 papers) and Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (20 papers). M.E. Einstein collaborates with scholars based in United States and Denmark. M.E. Einstein's co-authors include A. P. Schinckel, J.M. Bewley, M.M. Schutz, K. L. Thompson, J. A. Patterson, Kristin M. Burkholder, T.J. Applegate, Paul V. Preckel, David A. Rubin and P.Y. Hester and has published in prestigious journals such as Analytical Chemistry, Journal of Dairy Science and Journal of Animal Science.

In The Last Decade

M.E. Einstein

57 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
M.E. Einstein United States 21 1.2k 647 272 191 145 58 1.4k
Carmen Gallo Chile 22 1.1k 0.9× 746 1.2× 181 0.7× 208 1.1× 141 1.0× 87 1.6k
Carlos Piñeiro Japan 19 683 0.6× 608 0.9× 127 0.5× 185 1.0× 59 0.4× 51 1.0k
Nicole C Burdick Sanchez United States 21 1.0k 0.8× 727 1.1× 234 0.9× 576 3.0× 131 0.9× 113 1.6k
T.E. Lawrence United States 21 1.2k 1.0× 417 0.6× 246 0.9× 344 1.8× 429 3.0× 159 1.7k
M.G.B. Nieuwland Netherlands 27 1.1k 0.9× 278 0.4× 260 1.0× 134 0.7× 46 0.3× 68 1.6k
G. Bilkei United States 19 485 0.4× 528 0.8× 104 0.4× 229 1.2× 117 0.8× 94 981
A. K. W. TONG Canada 24 1.6k 1.3× 711 1.1× 569 2.1× 451 2.4× 239 1.6× 98 2.2k
Gürbüz Daş Germany 22 861 0.7× 763 1.2× 136 0.5× 127 0.7× 113 0.8× 70 1.4k
P. H. Brooks United Kingdom 19 634 0.5× 468 0.7× 173 0.6× 205 1.1× 239 1.6× 61 1.1k
G. de Vries Reilingh Netherlands 22 680 0.6× 347 0.5× 101 0.4× 142 0.7× 45 0.3× 42 1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by M.E. Einstein

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M.E. Einstein's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M.E. Einstein with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M.E. Einstein more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M.E. Einstein

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M.E. Einstein. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M.E. Einstein. The network helps show where M.E. Einstein may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of M.E. Einstein

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M.E. Einstein. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M.E. Einstein based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M.E. Einstein. M.E. Einstein is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Hester, P.Y., et al.. (2014). The effect of perch availability during pullet rearing and egg laying on the behavior of caged White Leghorn hens. Poultry Science. 93(10). 2423–2431. 4 indexed citations
2.
Hester, P.Y., et al.. (2013). The effect of perches in cages during pullet rearing and egg laying on hen performance, foot health, and plumage. Poultry Science. 92(2). 310–320. 29 indexed citations
3.
Hester, P.Y., et al.. (2013). The effect of perch availability during pullet rearing and egg laying on musculoskeletal health of caged White Leghorn hens. Poultry Science. 92(8). 1972–1980. 80 indexed citations
4.
Cheng, Heng, et al.. (2012). Early access to perches in caged White Leghorn pullets. Poultry Science. 91(9). 2114–2120. 44 indexed citations
5.
6.
7.
Bewley, J.M., et al.. (2008). Impact of Intake Water Temperatures on Reticular Temperatures of Lactating Dairy Cows. Journal of Dairy Science. 91(10). 3880–3887. 97 indexed citations
8.
Burkholder, Kristin M., K. L. Thompson, M.E. Einstein, T.J. Applegate, & J. A. Patterson. (2008). Influence of Stressors on Normal Intestinal Microbiota, Intestinal Morphology, and Susceptibility to Salmonella Enteritidis Colonization in Broilers. Poultry Science. 87(9). 1734–1741. 286 indexed citations
9.
Schinckel, A. P., et al.. (2007). Growth of protein, moisture, lipid, and ash of two genetic lines of barrows and gilts from twenty to one hundred twenty-five kilograms of body weight1. Journal of Animal Science. 86(2). 460–471. 34 indexed citations
10.
Schinckel, A. P., M.E. Einstein, Kenneth A. Foster, & Bruce Α. Craig. (2007). Evaluation of the impact of errors in the measurement of backfat depth on the prediction of fat-free lean mass. Journal of Animal Science. 85(8). 2031–2042. 7 indexed citations
11.
Schinckel, A. P., O. Adeola, & M.E. Einstein. (2005). Evaluation of alternative nonlinear mixed effects models of duck growth. Poultry Science. 84(2). 256–264. 20 indexed citations
12.
Schinckel, A. P., et al.. (2003). Ractopamine treatment biases in the prediction of pork carcass composition1. Journal of Animal Science. 81(1). 16–28. 27 indexed citations
13.
Schinckel, A. P., et al.. (2003). Development of a model to describe the compositional growth and dietary lysine requirements of pigs fed ractopamine. Journal of Animal Science. 81(5). 1106–1106. 61 indexed citations
14.
Schinckel, A. P., J. Richard Wagner, J. C. Forrest, & M.E. Einstein. (2001). Evaluation of alternative measures of pork carcass composition.. Journal of Animal Science. 79(5). 1093–1093. 38 indexed citations
15.
Smith, James W., Mike D Tokach, A. P. Schinckel, et al.. (1999). Developing farm-specific lysine requirements using accretion curves: Data collection procedures and techniques. Journal of Swine Health and Production. 7(6). 277–282. 10 indexed citations
16.
Grant, A.L., et al.. (1999). Health and growth performance of barrows reared in all-in/all-out or continuous flow facilities with or without a chlortetracycline feed additive. American Journal of Veterinary Research. 60(5). 603–608. 5 indexed citations
17.
Schinckel, A. P., Paul V. Preckel, & M.E. Einstein. (1996). Prediction of daily protein accretion rates of pigs from estimates of fat-free lean gain between 20 and 120 kilograms live weight.. Journal of Animal Science. 74(3). 498–498. 21 indexed citations
18.
Harris, D. L., et al.. (1994). Genetic progress of the US Yorkshire breed.. Proceedings of the World Congress on Genetics applied to Livestock Production. 425–428. 2 indexed citations
19.
Einstein, M.E., et al.. (1994). Comparison of litter adjustment factors in Yorkshire and Landrace data. Journal of Animal Science. 72(10). 2538–2543. 8 indexed citations
20.
Scheidt, A. B., L. Kirk Clark, T. R. Cline, et al.. (1990). Relationship of growth performance to pneumonia and atrophic rhinitis detected in pigs at slaughter. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association. 196(6). 881–884. 18 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Carmen Gallo Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Carlos Piñeiro Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Nicole C Burdick Sanchez Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by T.E. Lawrence Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by M.G.B. Nieuwland Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by G. Bilkei Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by A. K. W. TONG Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Gürbüz Daş Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by P. H. Brooks Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by G. de Vries Reilingh
Rankless by CCL
2026