McDowell Porter
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Marketing top 5%
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management top 10%
- Economics and Econometrics
- General Health Professions
- Co-authors
- Elyria KempJudith Anne Garretson FolseElizabeth TeisbergGeorge Bosworth BrownMy BuiNwamaka A. AnazaKristy E. ReynoldsDan Hamilton Rice
- Topics
- Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (5 papers)Digital Marketing and Social Media (4 papers)Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (4 papers)
- Cited by
- MarketingOrganizational Behavior and Human Resource ManagementSociology and Political Science
- Partner nations
- United StatesLatvia
In The Last Decade
McDowell Porter
13 papers receiving 271 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- Sociology and Political Science 148
- Marketing 137
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 57
- Economics and Econometrics 49
- General Health Professions 38
Countries citing papers authored by McDowell Porter
This map shows the geographic impact of McDowell Porter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by McDowell Porter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites McDowell Porter more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by McDowell Porter
This network shows the impact of papers produced by McDowell Porter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by McDowell Porter. The network helps show where McDowell Porter may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of McDowell Porter
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of McDowell Porter. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of McDowell Porter based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with McDowell Porter. McDowell Porter is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 9 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 48 | |
| 9 | 61 | |
| 10 | 5 | |
| 11 | 6 | |
| 12 | 30 | |
| 13 | 55 | |
| 14 | 15 | |
| 15 | Making competition in health care work. | 52 |
About McDowell Porter
McDowell Porter is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Marketing and Applied Psychology, having authored 15 papers that have together received 289 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (5 papers), Digital Marketing and Social Media (4 papers) and Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Marketing (137 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (57 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (148 citations). McDowell Porter has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Latvia. Frequent co-authors include Elyria Kemp, Judith Anne Garretson Folse, Elizabeth Teisberg, George Bosworth Brown, My Bui, Nwamaka A. Anaza, Kristy E. Reynolds, Dan Hamilton Rice, Kim Williams and Kyeong Sam Min. Their work appears in journals such as Psychology and Marketing, Journal of Consumer Marketing and Journal of Public Policy & Marketing.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.