Maxime De Guillebon
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 5%
- Epidemiology
- Surgery
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
- Neurology
- Co-authors
- Pierre BordacharMichel Haı̈ssaguerrePhilippe RitterSylvain PlouxPierre Jaı̈sJean‐Benoît ThamboJacques ClémentyArnaud Denis
- Topics
- Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies (14 papers)Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments (12 papers)Congenital Heart Disease Studies (7 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of the American College of CardiologyInternational Journal of CardiologyHeart Rhythm
- Partner nations
- FranceNetherlandsUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Maxime De Guillebon
16 papers receiving 486 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 19
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 473
- Epidemiology 143
- Surgery 102
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 59
- Neurology 35
Countries citing papers authored by Maxime De Guillebon
This map shows the geographic impact of Maxime De Guillebon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Maxime De Guillebon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Maxime De Guillebon more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Maxime De Guillebon
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Maxime De Guillebon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Maxime De Guillebon. The network helps show where Maxime De Guillebon may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Maxime De Guillebon
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Maxime De Guillebon. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Maxime De Guillebon based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Maxime De Guillebon. Maxime De Guillebon is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 13 | |
| 2 | 138 | |
| 3 | 10 | |
| 4 | 35 | |
| 5 | 14 | |
| 6 | 27 | |
| 7 | 16 | |
| 8 | 66 | |
| 9 | 32 | |
| 10 | 10 | |
| 11 | 18 | |
| 12 | 26 | |
| 13 | 35 | |
| 14 | 49 | |
| 15 | 7 | |
| 16 | 7 |
About Maxime De Guillebon
Maxime De Guillebon is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Medical Laboratory Technology and Epidemiology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 503 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies (14 papers), Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments (12 papers) and Congenital Heart Disease Studies (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (473 citations), Epidemiology (143 citations) and Neurology (35 citations). Maxime De Guillebon has collaborated with scholars based in France, Netherlands and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Pierre Bordachar, Michel Haı̈ssaguerre, Philippe Ritter, Sylvain Ploux, Pierre Jaı̈s, Jean‐Benoît Thambo, Jacques Clémenty, Arnaud Denis, Xavier Iriart and Nicolas Derval. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American College of Cardiology, International Journal of Cardiology and Heart Rhythm.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.