Max Villain
Impact in
- Ophthalmology top 0.5%
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders
- Retinal Diseases and Treatments
- Intraocular Surgery and Lenses
- Retinal and Optic Conditions
- Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome
-
- Corneal surgery and disorders
- Retinal Imaging and Analysis
Papers in
-
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders 20
- Retinal Diseases and Treatments 19
- Intraocular Surgery and Lenses 12
-
- Retinal Imaging and Analysis 13
- Corneal surgery and disorders 13
- Co-authors
- Vincent DaïenIsabelle CarrièreC. BonneAgnès MüllerD. HèveAnnick Le PapeCécile DelcourtPierre Fesler
- Journals
- Acta Ophthalmologica (9 papers)Ophthalmic Research (5 papers)JAMA Ophthalmology (4 papers)European Journal of Ophthalmology (3 papers)British Journal of Ophthalmology (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- FranceAustraliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Max Villain
68 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
- Ophthalmology 763
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 485
- Epidemiology 257
- Neurology 61
- Neurology 74
Countries citing papers authored by Max Villain
This map shows the geographic impact of Max Villain's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Max Villain with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Max Villain more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Max Villain
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Max Villain. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Max Villain. The network helps show where Max Villain may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Max Villain, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 2 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 23 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 34 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 10 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 0 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 20 | |
| 8 | Risks factors of retinal detachment following cataract surgery in a national population study between 2009 and 2012 | 2015 | 2 |
| 9 | 2013 | 52 | |
| 10 | 2012 | 7 | |
| 11 | 2012 | 66 | |
| 12 | 2012 | 9 | |
| 13 | 2008 | 14 | |
| 14 | 2008 | 13 | |
| 15 | 2006 | 5 | |
| 16 | 2002 | 6 | |
| 17 | 1998 | 130 | |
| 18 | 1997 | 45 | |
| 19 | 1997 | 4 | |
| 20 | 1996 | 5 |
About Max Villain
Max Villain is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Neurology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Epidemiology, having authored 74 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Glaucoma and retinal disorders (20 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (19 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (13 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (13 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (13 papers), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (12 papers), Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (10 papers) and Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (763 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (485 citations), Epidemiology (257 citations), Neurology (61 citations) and Neurology (74 citations). Max Villain has collaborated with scholars based in France, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Vincent Daïen, Isabelle Carrière, C. Bonne, Agnès Müller, D. Hève, Annick Le Pape, Cécile Delcourt, Pierre Fesler, David S. Greenfield and Sandy Lacombe. Their work appears in journals such as Acta Ophthalmologica, Ophthalmic Research, JAMA Ophthalmology, European Journal of Ophthalmology and British Journal of Ophthalmology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.