Maud Borie

1.4k total citations
20 papers, 780 citations indexed

About

Maud Borie is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Sociology and Political Science and Economics and Econometrics. According to data from OpenAlex, Maud Borie has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 780 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Global and Planetary Change, 11 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 6 papers in Economics and Econometrics. Recurrent topics in Maud Borie's work include Sustainability and Climate Change Governance (9 papers), Disaster Management and Resilience (7 papers) and Land Use and Ecosystem Services (4 papers). Maud Borie is often cited by papers focused on Sustainability and Climate Change Governance (9 papers), Disaster Management and Resilience (7 papers) and Land Use and Ecosystem Services (4 papers). Maud Borie collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and France. Maud Borie's co-authors include Mike Hulme, Noam Obermeister, Mark Pelling, Gina Ziervogel, Keith Hyams, Jasper Montana, Esther Turnhout, Martin Mahony, Carsten Neßhöver and Josef Settele and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature Climate Change, Global Environmental Change and Ecology and Society.

In The Last Decade

Maud Borie

18 papers receiving 753 citations

Peers

Maud Borie
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Global and Planetary Change 499
  • Sociology and Political Science 335
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 151
  • Economics and Econometrics 146
  • Political Science and International Relations 51
Replace Melinda Harm Benson with:
Melinda Harm Benson United States
Sonja Klinsky United States
Craig Anthony Arnold United States
Helene Amundsen Norway
Lorena Pasquini South Africa
Michelle Scobie Trinidad and Tobago
Jonas Ebbesson Sweden
María Alejandra Vélez Colombia
Marlène Buchy Netherlands
W. Tuinstra Netherlands
Melinda Harm Benson United States View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Maud Borie
Maud Borie · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Maud Borie
Maud Borie · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Maud Borie

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Maud Borie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Maud Borie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Maud Borie more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Maud Borie

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Maud Borie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Maud Borie. The network helps show where Maud Borie may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Maud Borie

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Maud Borie. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Maud Borie based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Maud Borie. Maud Borie is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 0
2 0
3 1
4 11
5 5
6 15
7 74
8 51
9 26
10 111
11
Changing the Paradigm for Risk Communication: Integrating Sciences to Understand Cultures
7
12 19
13 35
14 36
15 39
16 112
17
Climate change and the assessment of expert knowledge: Does the ipcc model need updating?
3
18 26
19 32
20 177

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026