Pedro Clemente

603 total citations
9 papers, 343 citations indexed

About

Pedro Clemente is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Economics and Econometrics and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law. According to data from OpenAlex, Pedro Clemente has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 343 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Global and Planetary Change, 4 papers in Economics and Econometrics and 2 papers in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law. Recurrent topics in Pedro Clemente's work include Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (6 papers), Land Use and Ecosystem Services (5 papers) and Economic and Environmental Valuation (4 papers). Pedro Clemente is often cited by papers focused on Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (6 papers), Land Use and Ecosystem Services (5 papers) and Economic and Environmental Valuation (4 papers). Pedro Clemente collaborates with scholars based in Portugal, Germany and Netherlands. Pedro Clemente's co-authors include Paula Antunes, Rui Santos, Irene Ring, Jorge Orestes Cerdeira, Maria João Martins, Christoph Schröter‐Schlaack, Roy Brouwer, Rute Pinto, Grazia Zulian and Małgorzata Grodzińska‐Jurczak and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Ecological Economics and Ecological Indicators.

In The Last Decade

Pedro Clemente

9 papers receiving 333 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Pedro Clemente Portugal 8 236 134 79 67 45 9 343
Jacob Ainscough United Kingdom 6 256 1.1× 75 0.6× 60 0.8× 81 1.2× 50 1.1× 12 356
Karen E. Allen United States 9 212 0.9× 101 0.8× 32 0.4× 71 1.1× 50 1.1× 19 308
René Bertiller Switzerland 4 385 1.6× 101 0.8× 94 1.2× 67 1.0× 96 2.1× 6 507
Magnus Tuvendal Sweden 8 381 1.6× 95 0.7× 137 1.7× 92 1.4× 78 1.7× 10 514
Miza Khamis Finland 5 387 1.6× 86 0.6× 127 1.6× 76 1.1× 76 1.7× 7 470
Javier Escalera-Reyes Spain 7 247 1.0× 67 0.5× 56 0.7× 61 0.9× 48 1.1× 12 362
Kati Häfner Germany 8 290 1.2× 111 0.8× 139 1.8× 46 0.7× 41 0.9× 14 440
Irit Amit-Cohen Israel 8 158 0.7× 42 0.3× 140 1.8× 42 0.6× 37 0.8× 16 395
Ronju Ahammad Australia 11 299 1.3× 71 0.5× 29 0.4× 65 1.0× 69 1.5× 22 411
Ola Wetterberg Sweden 2 284 1.2× 56 0.4× 122 1.5× 68 1.0× 38 0.8× 7 397

Countries citing papers authored by Pedro Clemente

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Pedro Clemente's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pedro Clemente with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pedro Clemente more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Pedro Clemente

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pedro Clemente. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pedro Clemente. The network helps show where Pedro Clemente may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Pedro Clemente

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Pedro Clemente. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Pedro Clemente based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Pedro Clemente. Pedro Clemente is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Fernandes, João, et al.. (2020). Coupling spatial pollination supply models with local demand mapping to support collaborative management of ecosystem services. Ecosystems and People. 16(1). 212–229. 15 indexed citations
2.
Pinto, Rute, Paula Antunes, Stefan Blumentrath, et al.. (2019). Spatial modelling of biodiversity conservation priorities in Portugal’s Montado ecosystem using Marxan with Zones. Environmental Conservation. 46(4). 251–260. 7 indexed citations
3.
Lenormand, Maxime, Sandra Luque, Johannes Langemeyer, et al.. (2018). Multiscale socio-ecological networks in the age of information. PLoS ONE. 13(11). e0206672–e0206672. 34 indexed citations
4.
5.
Santos, Rui, Pedro Clemente, Roy Brouwer, Paula Antunes, & Rute Pinto. (2015). Landowner preferences for agri-environmental agreements to conserve the montado ecosystem in Portugal. Ecological Economics. 118. 159–167. 36 indexed citations
6.
Santos, Rui, Christoph Schröter‐Schlaack, Paula Antunes, Irene Ring, & Pedro Clemente. (2015). Reviewing the role of habitat banking and tradable development rights in the conservation policy mix. Environmental Conservation. 42(4). 294–305. 32 indexed citations
7.
Santos, Rui, Paula Antunes, Irene Ring, & Pedro Clemente. (2014). Engaging Local Private and Public Actors in Biodiversity Conservation: The role of Agri‐Environmental schemes and Ecological fiscal transfers. Environmental Policy and Governance. 25(2). 83–96. 17 indexed citations
8.
Schröter‐Schlaack, Christoph, Irene Ring, Thomas Koellner, et al.. (2014). Intergovernmental fiscal transfers to support local conservation action in Europe. Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsgeographie. 58(1). 98–114. 26 indexed citations
9.
Santos, Rui, Irene Ring, Paula Antunes, & Pedro Clemente. (2011). Fiscal transfers for biodiversity conservation: The Portuguese Local Finances Law. Land Use Policy. 29(2). 261–273. 51 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026