Keith Hyams

1.2k total citations · 1 hit paper
28 papers, 637 citations indexed

About

Keith Hyams is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations and Global and Planetary Change. According to data from OpenAlex, Keith Hyams has authored 28 papers receiving a total of 637 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 11 papers in Political Science and International Relations and 8 papers in Global and Planetary Change. Recurrent topics in Keith Hyams's work include Political Philosophy and Ethics (9 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (4 papers) and Climate Change and Geoengineering (4 papers). Keith Hyams is often cited by papers focused on Political Philosophy and Ethics (9 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (4 papers) and Climate Change and Geoengineering (4 papers). Keith Hyams collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Uganda and United States. Keith Hyams's co-authors include Mark Pelling, Gina Ziervogel, Tina Fawcett, Maud Borie, Morten Fibieger Byskov, Eric Chu, Lucy Rodina, Kavya Michael, Daniel Scott and Leila M. Harris and has published in prestigious journals such as Global Environmental Change, Sustainability and Environmental Research Letters.

In The Last Decade

Keith Hyams

27 papers receiving 598 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Inserting rights and justice into urban resilience: a focus on everyday risk

2017 241 citations Gina Ziervogel, Mark Pelling et al. Environment and Urbanization profile →

Peers

Keith Hyams

SPS

GPC

EE

HTM

US

Markus Keck Germany

Carrie L. Mitchell Canada

Raven Cretney New Zealand

Zachary Lamb United States

Daniel B. Gallagher United States

Diane Archer United Kingdom

Aditya Bahadur United Kingdom

David Matyas United Kingdom

Jorgelina Hardoy United States

Maud Borie United Kingdom

Markus Keck Germany

Keith Hyams

289 ×0.9

SPS

209 ×0.8

GPC

113 ×0.9

EE

39 ×0.7

HTM

59 ×1.0

US

Citations per year, relative to Keith Hyams Keith Hyams (= 1×) peers Markus Keck

Countries citing papers authored by Keith Hyams

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Keith Hyams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Keith Hyams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Keith Hyams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Keith Hyams

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Keith Hyams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Keith Hyams. The network helps show where Keith Hyams may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Keith Hyams

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Keith Hyams. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Keith Hyams based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Keith Hyams. Keith Hyams is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

1.

Hyams, Keith. (2024). Can Empathy Provide a Route to Democratic Inclusivity?. Political Studies. 73(2). 682–700. 2 indexed citations

2.

Galappaththi, Eranga K., James D. Ford, Chandni Singh, et al.. (2023). Indigenous peoples and the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic scoping review. Environmental Research Letters. 18(3). 33001–33001. 26 indexed citations

3.

Kunyanga, Catherine Nkirote, et al.. (2023). Perceptions of the Governance of the Technological Risks of Food Innovations for Addressing Food Security. Sustainability. 15(15). 11503–11503. 4 indexed citations

4.

Chicmana-Zapata, Victoria, Ingrid Arotoma‐Rojas, Cecilia Anza‐Ramirez, et al.. (2023). Justice implications of health and food security policies for Indigenous peoples facing COVID-19: a qualitative study and policy analysis in Peru. Health Policy and Planning. 38(Supplement_2). ii36–ii50. 4 indexed citations

5.

Kunyanga, Catherine Nkirote, et al.. (2023). Influence of COVID-19 Pandemic on Food Market Prices and Food Supply in Urban Markets in Nairobi, Kenya. Sustainability. 15(2). 1304–1304. 5 indexed citations

6.

Galappaththi, Eranga K., James D. Ford, Sarath S. Kodithuwakku, et al.. (2023). Policy responses to COVID-19 in Sri Lanka and the consideration of Indigenous Peoples. Environmental Science & Policy. 144. 110–123. 8 indexed citations

7.

Hyams, Keith, et al.. (2022). Global Catastrophic Risk and the Drivers of Scientist Attitudes Towards Policy. Science and Engineering Ethics. 28(6). 50–50. 1 indexed citations

8.

Byskov, Morten Fibieger & Keith Hyams. (2022). Who Should Represent Future Generations in Climate Planning?. Ethics & International Affairs. 36(2). 199–214. 9 indexed citations

9.

Byskov, Morten Fibieger & Keith Hyams. (2022). Epistemic injustice in Climate Adaptation. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice. 25(4). 613–634. 23 indexed citations

10.

Coggins, Shaugn, Lea Berrang‐Ford, Keith Hyams, et al.. (2021). Empirical assessment of equity and justice in climate adaptation literature: a systematic map. Environmental Research Letters. 16(7). 73003–73003. 47 indexed citations

11.

Hyams, Keith, et al.. (2021). Global policymakers and catastrophic risk. Policy Sciences. 55(1). 3–21. 5 indexed citations

12.

Satyal, Poshendra, Morten Fibieger Byskov, & Keith Hyams. (2020). Addressing multi-dimensional injustice in indigenous adaptation: the case of Uganda’s Batwa community. Climate and Development. 13(6). 529–542. 12 indexed citations

13.

Hyams, Keith. (2019). Risk, Responsibility, and Choice. Social Theory and Practice. 45(1). 21–41. 4 indexed citations

14.

Borie, Maud, Mark Pelling, Gina Ziervogel, & Keith Hyams. (2019). Mapping narratives of urban resilience in the global south. Global Environmental Change. 54. 203–213. 111 indexed citations

15.

Hyams, Keith. (2017). When do Risky Choices Justify Inequality?. Diametros. 53(53). 60–74. 1 indexed citations

16.

Ziervogel, Gina, Mark Pelling, Anton Cartwright, et al.. (2017). Inserting rights and justice into urban resilience: a focus on everyday risk. Environment and Urbanization. 29(1). 123–138. 241 indexed citations breakdown →

17.

Mayne, Ruth, Tina Fawcett, & Keith Hyams. (2016). Climate justice and energy: applying international principles to UK residential energy policy. Local Environment. 22(4). 393–409. 17 indexed citations

18.

Hyams, Keith. (2013). Equality, Responsibility, and the Balance of Interests. Journal of Social Philosophy. 44(4). 392–401. 1 indexed citations

19.

Hyams, Keith. (2009). A Just Response to Climate Change: Personal Carbon Allowances and the Normal‐Functioning Approach. Journal of Social Philosophy. 40(2). 237–256. 26 indexed citations

20.

McGreal, Stanley, et al.. (2006). Evaluation of the Urban White Paper Fiscal Measures. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact