Matthias Diemer
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 1%
- Plant Science top 2%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 2%
- Ecology top 5%
- Global and Planetary Change top 5%
- Co-authors
- Christian KörnerBernhard SchmidRegula BilleterDanny A. P. HooftmanJudit LienertEva SpehnJasmin JoshiMarkus Fischer
- Topics
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (25 papers)Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (15 papers)Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology (9 papers)
- Cited by
- Nature and Landscape ConservationEcological ModelingEcology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- Partner nations
- SwitzerlandAustriaGermany
In The Last Decade
Matthias Diemer
39 papers receiving 1.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 877
- Plant Science 819
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 587
- Ecology 505
- Global and Planetary Change 497
Countries citing papers authored by Matthias Diemer
This map shows the geographic impact of Matthias Diemer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthias Diemer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthias Diemer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Matthias Diemer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthias Diemer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthias Diemer. The network helps show where Matthias Diemer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Matthias Diemer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Matthias Diemer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Matthias Diemer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Matthias Diemer. Matthias Diemer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 23 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 51 | |
| 4 | 70 | |
| 5 | 20 | |
| 6 | 16 | |
| 7 | 26 | |
| 8 | 61 | |
| 9 | 54 | |
| 10 | 76 | |
| 11 | 96 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 22 | |
| 14 | 19 | |
| 15 | 50 | |
| 16 | 41 | |
| 17 | 10 | |
| 18 | 44 | |
| 19 | 71 | |
| 20 | 21 |
About Matthias Diemer
Matthias Diemer is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Forestry and Plant Science, having authored 39 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (25 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (15 papers) and Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (877 citations), Ecological Modeling (135 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (587 citations). Matthias Diemer has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, Austria and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Christian Körner, Bernhard Schmid, Regula Billeter, Danny A. P. Hooftman, Judit Lienert, Eva Spehn, Jasmin Joshi, Markus Fischer, Mark van Kleunen and John A. Arnone. Their work appears in journals such as Conservation Biology, Oecologia and Biological Conservation.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.