Mark van Kleunen
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 0.05%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 0.02%
- Plant Science top 0.1%
- Ecology top 0.2%
- Ecological Modeling top 0.1%
- Co-authors
- Markus FischerWayne DawsonEwald WeberBernhard SchmidPetr PyšekYanjie LiuFranz EsslAdrienne B. Nicotra
- Topics
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (218 papers)Plant and animal studies (199 papers)Plant Parasitism and Resistance (80 papers)
- Cited by
- Nature and Landscape ConservationEcological ModelingEcology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- Partner nations
- GermanyChinaSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Mark van Kleunen
288 papers receiving 16.2k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 150
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 8.8k
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 8.1k
- Plant Science 7.1k
- Ecology 4.1k
- Ecological Modeling 2.6k
Countries citing papers authored by Mark van Kleunen
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark van Kleunen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark van Kleunen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark van Kleunen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark van Kleunen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark van Kleunen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark van Kleunen. The network helps show where Mark van Kleunen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark van Kleunen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark van Kleunen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark van Kleunen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark van Kleunen. Mark van Kleunen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 11 | |
| 6 | 12 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | 10 | |
| 10 | 9 | |
| 11 | 24 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 10 | |
| 14 | 10 | |
| 15 | 12 | |
| 16 | 4 | |
| 17 | Effect of allelopathy on plant performance: a meta‐analysisbreakdown → | 197 |
| 18 | Do invasive alien plants benefit more from global environmental change than native plants?breakdown → | 273 |
| 19 | 161 | |
| 20 | 46 |
About Mark van Kleunen
Mark van Kleunen is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecological Modeling and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 301 papers that have together received 16.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (218 papers), Plant and animal studies (199 papers) and Plant Parasitism and Resistance (80 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (8.8k citations), Ecological Modeling (2.6k citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (8.1k citations). Mark van Kleunen has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, China and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Markus Fischer, Wayne Dawson, Ewald Weber, Bernhard Schmid, Markus Fischer, Petr Pyšek, Yanjie Liu, Franz Essl, Adrienne B. Nicotra and Fernando Valladares. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Nature Communications.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.