Matthew W. Lowder

1.1k total citations
30 papers, 609 citations indexed

About

Matthew W. Lowder is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Artificial Intelligence. According to data from OpenAlex, Matthew W. Lowder has authored 30 papers receiving a total of 609 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 23 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 19 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 11 papers in Artificial Intelligence. Recurrent topics in Matthew W. Lowder's work include Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (20 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (18 papers) and Text Readability and Simplification (9 papers). Matthew W. Lowder is often cited by papers focused on Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (20 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (18 papers) and Text Readability and Simplification (9 papers). Matthew W. Lowder collaborates with scholars based in United States, South Korea and United Kingdom. Matthew W. Lowder's co-authors include Peter C. Gordon, Fernanda Ferreira, Wonil Choi, John M. Henderson, John M. Henderson, Peggy L. St. Jacques, Martin Conway, Roberto Cabeza, Tamara Y. Swaab and Marcus Lee Johnson and has published in prestigious journals such as NeuroImage, Cognition and Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

In The Last Decade

Matthew W. Lowder

29 papers receiving 583 citations

Peers

Matthew W. Lowder
Eva Belke Germany
Rachel Ryskin United States
Trevor Brothers United States
Nikole D. Patson United States
Benjamin Swets United States
Andrea Krott United Kingdom
Sergey Avrutin Netherlands
Jennifer Balogh United States
Eva Belke Germany
Matthew W. Lowder
Citations per year, relative to Matthew W. Lowder Matthew W. Lowder (= 1×) peers Eva Belke

Countries citing papers authored by Matthew W. Lowder

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew W. Lowder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew W. Lowder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew W. Lowder more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew W. Lowder

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew W. Lowder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew W. Lowder. The network helps show where Matthew W. Lowder may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Matthew W. Lowder

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Matthew W. Lowder. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Matthew W. Lowder based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Matthew W. Lowder. Matthew W. Lowder is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Lowder, Matthew W., et al.. (2025). Comparing sustained attention performance across laboratory-based versus web-based settings. Attention Perception & Psychophysics. 87(6). 2029–2040.
2.
Lowder, Matthew W., et al.. (2023). Emotionality effects in Korean visual word recognition: Evidence from lab-based and web-based lexical decision tasks. Acta Psychologica. 237. 103944–103944. 2 indexed citations
3.
Lowder, Matthew W., et al.. (2023). The lab discovered: Place-for-institution metonyms appearing in subject position are processed as agents.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 50(7). 1152–1166. 1 indexed citations
4.
Lowder, Matthew W., et al.. (2022). Effects of syntactic structure on the processing of lexical repetition during sentence reading. Memory & Cognition. 51(5). 1249–1263. 2 indexed citations
5.
Lowder, Matthew W., et al.. (2021). Effects of Print Exposure on an Online Lexical Decision Task: A Direct Replication Using a Web-Based Experimental Procedure. Frontiers in Psychology. 12. 710663–710663. 5 indexed citations
6.
Gordon, Peter C., et al.. (2019). Individual differences in reading: Separable effects of reading experience and processing skill. Memory & Cognition. 48(4). 553–565. 14 indexed citations
7.
Lowder, Matthew W. & Fernanda Ferreira. (2018). I see what you meant to say: Anticipating speech errors during online sentence processing.. Journal of Experimental Psychology General. 148(10). 1849–1858. 8 indexed citations
8.
Choi, Wonil, Matthew W. Lowder, Fernanda Ferreira, Tamara Y. Swaab, & John M. Henderson. (2017). Effects of word predictability and preview lexicality on eye movements during reading: A comparison between young and older adults.. Psychology and Aging. 32(3). 232–242. 47 indexed citations
9.
Lowder, Matthew W. & Peter C. Gordon. (2017). Print exposure modulates the effects of repetition priming during sentence reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 24(6). 1935–1942. 13 indexed citations
10.
Lowder, Matthew W. & Fernanda Ferreira. (2016). Prediction in the processing of repair disfluencies: Evidence from the visual-world paradigm.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 42(9). 1400–1416. 20 indexed citations
11.
Henderson, John M., Wonil Choi, Matthew W. Lowder, & Fernanda Ferreira. (2016). Language structure in the brain: A fixation-related fMRI study of syntactic surprisal in reading. NeuroImage. 132. 293–300. 109 indexed citations
12.
Choi, Wonil, Matthew W. Lowder, Fernanda Ferreira, & John M. Henderson. (2015). Individual differences in the perceptual span during reading: Evidence from the moving window technique. Attention Perception & Psychophysics. 77(7). 2463–2475. 30 indexed citations
13.
Lowder, Matthew W. & Peter C. Gordon. (2015). Focus takes time: structural effects on reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 22(6). 1733–1738. 26 indexed citations
14.
Lowder, Matthew W. & Peter C. Gordon. (2014). Natural forces as agents: Reconceptualizing the animate–inanimate distinction. Cognition. 136. 85–90. 31 indexed citations
15.
Lowder, Matthew W. & Peter C. Gordon. (2014). The manuscript that we finished: Structural separation reduces the cost of complement coercion.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 41(2). 526–540. 5 indexed citations
16.
Lowder, Matthew W., Wonil Choi, & Peter C. Gordon. (2013). Word recognition during reading: The interaction between lexical repetition and frequency. Memory & Cognition. 41(5). 738–751. 18 indexed citations
17.
Lowder, Matthew W. & Peter C. Gordon. (2013). It’s hard to offend the college: Effects of sentence structure on figurative-language processing.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 39(4). 993–1011. 18 indexed citations
18.
Lowder, Matthew W. & Peter C. Gordon. (2012). The pistol that injured the cowboy: Difficulty with inanimate subject–verb integration is reduced by structural separation. Journal of Memory and Language. 66(4). 819–832. 19 indexed citations
19.
Johnson, Marcus Lee, Matthew W. Lowder, & Peter C. Gordon. (2011). The sentence-composition effect: Processing of complex sentences depends on the configuration of common noun phrases versus unusual noun phrases.. Journal of Experimental Psychology General. 140(4). 707–724. 23 indexed citations
20.
Burk, Joshua A., et al.. (2008). Attentional demands for demonstrating deficits following intrabasalis infusions of 192 IgG-saporin. Behavioural Brain Research. 195(2). 231–238. 6 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026