Matthew T. Cole

4.2k citations
102 papers · 2.1k · h-index 26

Impact in

Papers in

Matthew T. Cole

98 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers

Matthew T. Cole
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Structural Biology 65
  • Materials Chemistry 1.3k
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 411
  • Biomedical Engineering 704
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 913
Replace Tomáš Šikola with:
Tomáš Šikola Czechia
Kyung Song South Korea
Jinkyoung Yoo South Korea
Changxi Zheng Australia
Gheorghe Stan United States
Sergiy Krylyuk United States
Joshua W. Kevek United States
Massimo Cuscunà Italy
Kuan Eng Johnson Goh Singapore
Zijian Hong China
Matthew T. Cole relative to Tomáš Šikola Czechia Tomáš Šikola's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Tomáš Šikola · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Matthew T. Cole

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew T. Cole's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew T. Cole with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew T. Cole more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew T. Cole

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew T. Cole. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew T. Cole. The network helps show where Matthew T. Cole may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Matthew T. Cole, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Matthew T. Cole Line = papers co-authored together Matthew T. Cole links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 102 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014179
2 2015139
3 2013107
4 201390
5 201172
6 201470
7 201268
8 201966
9 201461
10 201260
11 201160
12 201056
13 201453
14 201349
15 201447
16 201646
17 201145
18 201343
19 201843
20 201742

About Matthew T. Cole

Matthew T. Cole is a scholar working on Materials Chemistry, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Biomedical Engineering and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, having authored 102 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Graphene research and applications (39 papers), Carbon Nanotubes in Composites (30 papers), Gyrotron and Vacuum Electronics Research (15 papers), Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research (13 papers), Nanowire Synthesis and Applications (11 papers), Semiconductor materials and devices (9 papers), Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications (7 papers) and Microwave Engineering and Waveguides (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Structural Biology (65 citations), Materials Chemistry (1.3k citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (411 citations), Biomedical Engineering (704 citations) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (913 citations). Matthew T. Cole has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, China and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include W. I. Milne, Kenneth B. K. Teo, Jie Sun, A. Yurgens, Niclas Lindvall, Richard Parmee, Yang Hao, Bian Wu, Bin Yang and Chi Li. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, Applied Physics Letters, Advanced Materials, Carbon and Nanomaterials.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact