Matthew S. Dietz
- Ecological Modeling top 5%
- Species Distribution and Climate Change 6
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies 9
- Global and Planetary Change top 5%
- Land Use and Ecosystem Services 5
- Fire effects on ecosystems 4
- Forest Management and Policy 4
- Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management 3
- Ecology top 5%
- Wildlife Ecology and Conservation 6
- Rangeland and Wildlife Management 5
- Co-authors
- R. Travis BeloteGregory H. ApletAndrew J. LarsonC. Alina CanslerSean A. ParksPeter S. McKinleyGareth IrwinJosh Gage
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Matthew S. Dietz
17 papers receiving 550 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
- Ecological Modeling 126
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 218
- Global and Planetary Change 378
- Ecology 379
- Developmental Biology 12
Countries citing papers authored by Matthew S. Dietz
This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew S. Dietz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew S. Dietz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew S. Dietz more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew S. Dietz
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew S. Dietz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew S. Dietz. The network helps show where Matthew S. Dietz may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Matthew S. Dietz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2023 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2021 | 12 | |
| 3 | 2021 | 7 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 42 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 20 | |
| 6 | 2020 | 18 | |
| 7 | 2017 | 28 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 70 | |
| 9 | 2016 | 122 | |
| 10 | The next 50 years: Opportunities for diversifying the ecological representation of the National Wilderness Preservation System | 2015 | 1 |
| 11 | 2015 | 17 | |
| 12 | 2015 | 6 | |
| 13 | 2015 | 39 | |
| 14 | 2015 | 10 | |
| 15 | 2015 | 28 | |
| 16 | 2013 | 136 | |
| 17 | 2013 | 13 | |
| 18 | 2013 | 15 | |
| 19 | Managing public lands to support viable wildlife populations in Montana's High Plains : The Montana High Plains Ecosystem Recovery Plan | 1995 | 0 |
About Matthew S. Dietz
Matthew S. Dietz is a scholar working on Ecological Modeling, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Global and Planetary Change, having authored 19 papers that have together received 584 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (9 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (6 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (6 papers), Land Use and Ecosystem Services (5 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (5 papers), Fire effects on ecosystems (4 papers), Forest Management and Policy (4 papers) and Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (126 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (218 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (378 citations). Matthew S. Dietz has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include R. Travis Belote, Gregory H. Aplet, Andrew J. Larson, C. Alina Cansler, Sean A. Parks, Peter S. McKinley, Gareth Irwin, Josh Gage, Jocelyn L. Aycrigg and Clinton N. Jenkins. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, BioScience and Biological Conservation.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.