Citations per year, relative to A.G.M. Schotman A.G.M. Schotman (= 1×)
peers
Reed F. Noss
Countries citing papers authored by A.G.M. Schotman
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of A.G.M. Schotman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A.G.M. Schotman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A.G.M. Schotman more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by A.G.M. Schotman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A.G.M. Schotman. The network helps show where A.G.M. Schotman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of A.G.M. Schotman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of A.G.M. Schotman.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of A.G.M. Schotman based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with A.G.M. Schotman. A.G.M. Schotman is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Henkens, R.J.H.G., et al.. (2012). Recreatie en natuur : kennis over effecten, kwetsbaarheid, handelingsperspectieven en monitoring van recreatie in Natura 2000-gebieden. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS).
4.
Melman, T.C.P., et al.. (2011). Oproep; Kerngebieden voor weidevogels, wat brengt dat ons?. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 112(6).1 indexed citations
5.
Schotman, A.G.M., et al.. (2010). An internet-accessible tool for drawing up tailor made management plans for meadow birds. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 100(100). 405–414.4 indexed citations
Melman, T.C.P., et al.. (2008). Application of open source and proprietary software to optimise meadow bird management schemes in the Netherlands. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 325–332.3 indexed citations
10.
Melman, T.C.P., et al.. (2007). Ecologische evaluatie regelingen voor natuurbeheer : programma beheer en Staatsbosbeheer 2000-2006. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS).4 indexed citations
11.
Melman, T.C.P., et al.. (2006). Evaluatie weidevogelbeheer met een grutto-mozaiekmodel. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 107(3). 141–145.1 indexed citations
12.
Schotman, A.G.M., et al.. (2005). Naar een grutto-mozaïekmodel : definitie van een model voor evaluatie vooraf van de effectiviteit van mozaïekbeheer, stand van zaken juni 2005. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS).2 indexed citations
13.
Schotman, A.G.M., et al.. (2002). The quality of small woods for the European Nuthatch Sitta europaea.. 73–80.1 indexed citations
14.
Bugter, R.J.F., et al.. (2000). Beoordeling ecologische effecten reactivering 'IJzeren Rijn' op het gebied de Meinweg; een toetsing in het kader van de EU-Vogelrichtlijn en de EU-Habitatrichtlijn. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling.
Verboom, J. & A.G.M. Schotman. (1994). Responses of metapopulations to a changing landscape. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling.2 indexed citations
19.
Schotman, A.G.M., et al.. (1994). Voorspelling van het effect van ontsnipperende maatregelen in het gebied Rolde/Gieten. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling.1 indexed citations
20.
Schotman, A.G.M. & P.F.M. Opdam. (1994). Geographical variation in forest bird densities in The Netherlands.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.