Sarah E. Reed

3.2k total citations
53 papers, 2.2k citations indexed

About

Sarah E. Reed is a scholar working on Ecology, Global and Planetary Change and Economics and Econometrics. According to data from OpenAlex, Sarah E. Reed has authored 53 papers receiving a total of 2.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 27 papers in Ecology, 19 papers in Global and Planetary Change and 15 papers in Economics and Econometrics. Recurrent topics in Sarah E. Reed's work include Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (19 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (15 papers) and Land Use and Ecosystem Services (14 papers). Sarah E. Reed is often cited by papers focused on Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (19 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (15 papers) and Land Use and Ecosystem Services (14 papers). Sarah E. Reed collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Sarah E. Reed's co-authors include Adina M. Merenlender, Kevin R. Crooks, Courtney L. Larson, Richard C. Thompson, Kevin A. Hughes, David M. Theobald, David A. Newburn, Liba Pejchar, Peter Berck and Michael Soulé and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, Environmental Science & Technology and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Sarah E. Reed

51 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Sarah E. Reed United States 23 1.1k 587 372 262 239 53 2.2k
Christine A. Ribic United States 42 3.2k 2.8× 1.3k 2.1× 815 2.2× 95 0.4× 411 1.7× 125 4.8k
Corrado Battisti Italy 31 1.7k 1.5× 735 1.3× 1.2k 3.1× 54 0.2× 523 2.2× 229 3.3k
Eric Stienen Belgium 24 1.3k 1.1× 426 0.7× 584 1.6× 47 0.2× 342 1.4× 153 2.2k
Tim Diekötter Germany 29 681 0.6× 412 0.7× 179 0.5× 58 0.2× 139 0.6× 67 3.1k
Ben Phalan United Kingdom 37 3.0k 2.7× 2.8k 4.8× 158 0.4× 701 2.7× 51 0.2× 67 6.3k
Christine S. O’Connell United States 11 1.2k 1.1× 658 1.1× 75 0.2× 129 0.5× 44 0.2× 17 2.5k
Rob Williams United States 36 3.7k 3.3× 1.0k 1.8× 284 0.8× 20 0.1× 140 0.6× 113 4.4k
Andrew Burger Canada 26 1.9k 1.7× 669 1.1× 189 0.5× 27 0.1× 72 0.3× 88 2.4k
Maria Correa-Cano United Kingdom 8 592 0.5× 432 0.7× 67 0.2× 26 0.1× 37 0.2× 10 1.8k
Matthew S. Savoca United States 18 840 0.8× 284 0.5× 652 1.8× 11 0.0× 426 1.8× 38 1.7k

Countries citing papers authored by Sarah E. Reed

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah E. Reed's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah E. Reed with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah E. Reed more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah E. Reed

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah E. Reed. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah E. Reed. The network helps show where Sarah E. Reed may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sarah E. Reed

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sarah E. Reed. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sarah E. Reed based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sarah E. Reed. Sarah E. Reed is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Larson, Courtney L., Sarah E. Reed, & Kevin R. Crooks. (2023). Reptile responses to outdoor recreation in urban habitat fragments. Urban Ecosystems. 27(2). 453–468. 3 indexed citations
2.
Larson, Courtney L., et al.. (2021). Recreation effects on wildlife: a review of potential quantitative thresholds. Nature Conservation. 44. 51–68. 33 indexed citations
3.
Larson, Courtney L., Sarah E. Reed, & Kevin R. Crooks. (2020). Increased hiking and mountain biking are associated with declines in urban mammal activity. 4 indexed citations
4.
Larson, Courtney L., Sarah E. Reed, Adina M. Merenlender, & Kevin R. Crooks. (2019). A meta‐analysis of recreation effects on vertebrate species richness and abundance. Conservation Science and Practice. 1(10). 34 indexed citations
5.
Cole, Matthew, Rachel Coppock, Penelope K. Lindeque, et al.. (2019). Effects of Nylon Microplastic on Feeding, Lipid Accumulation, and Moulting in a Coldwater Copepod. Environmental Science & Technology. 53(12). 7075–7082. 192 indexed citations
6.
Reed, Sarah E., et al.. (2018). Microplastics in marine sediments near Rothera Research Station, Antarctica. Marine Pollution Bulletin. 133. 460–463. 194 indexed citations
7.
Reed, Sarah E., et al.. (2018). Social Network Analysis Identifies Key Participants in Conservation Development. Environmental Management. 61(5). 732–740. 8 indexed citations
8.
Gallo, Travis, et al.. (2017). The effect of exurban development on wintering birds in Colorado. The Wilson Journal of Ornithology. 129(1). 85–97. 3 indexed citations
9.
Larson, Courtney L., Sarah E. Reed, Adina M. Merenlender, & Kevin R. Crooks. (2016). Effects of Recreation on Animals Revealed as Widespread through a Global Systematic Review. PLoS ONE. 11(12). e0167259–e0167259. 219 indexed citations
10.
Kreylos, Oliver, L. H. Kellogg, Sarah E. Reed, et al.. (2016). The AR Sandbox: Augmented Reality in Geoscience Education. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2016. 3 indexed citations
11.
Reed, Sarah E., Oliver Kreylos, Sherry Hsi, et al.. (2014). Shaping Watersheds Exhibit: An Interactive, Augmented Reality Sandbox for Advancing Earth Science Education. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2014. 41 indexed citations
12.
Brown, Casey L., Sarah E. Reed, Matthew S. Dietz, & Kurt M. Fristrup. (2013). Detection and Classification of Motor Vehicle Noise in a Forested Landscape. Environmental Management. 52(5). 1262–1270. 13 indexed citations
13.
Reed, Sarah E., et al.. (2012). Comparative Analysis of Housing in Conservation Developments: Colorado Case Studies. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 4(1). 149–176. 11 indexed citations
14.
Shilling, Fraser, et al.. (2012). Recreational System Optimization to Reduce Conflict on Public Lands. Environmental Management. 50(3). 381–395. 13 indexed citations
15.
Baldwin, Robert F., et al.. (2012). Connectivity Restoration in Large Landscapes: Modeling Landscape Condition and Ecological Flows. Ecological Restoration. 30(4). 274–279. 10 indexed citations
16.
Reed, Sarah E. & Adina M. Merenlender. (2011). Effects of Management of Domestic Dogs and Recreation on Carnivores in Protected Areas in Northern California. Conservation Biology. 25(3). 504–513. 50 indexed citations
17.
Theobald, David M., et al.. (2011). Connecting natural landscapes using a landscape permeability model to prioritize conservation activities in the United States. Conservation Letters. 5(2). 123–133. 150 indexed citations
18.
Reed, Sarah E.. (2011). Non-Invasive Methods to Assess Co-Occurrence of Mammalian Carnivores. The Southwestern Naturalist. 56(2). 231–240. 20 indexed citations
19.
Merenlender, Adina M., David A. Newburn, Sarah E. Reed, & Adena R. Rissman. (2009). The importance of incorporating threat for efficient targeting and evaluation of conservation investments. Conservation Letters. 2(5). 240–241. 17 indexed citations
20.
Reed, Sarah E. & Adina M. Merenlender. (2008). Quiet, Nonconsumptive Recreation Reduces Protected Area Effectiveness. Conservation Letters. 1(3). 146–154. 153 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026