Matthew N. Foster
- Ecology top 10%
- Global and Planetary Change top 10%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 10%
- Ecological Modeling top 5%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- Co-authors
- Thomas M. BrooksNaamal De SilvaDavid Rodríguez‐RodríguezBastian BomhardStuart H. M. ButchartO. HuberAdriano Pereira PagliaCraig Hilton‐Taylor
- Topics
- Species Distribution and Climate Change (3 papers)Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (2 papers)Coleoptera: Cerambycidae studies (1 paper)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaBiological ConservationBiodiversity and Conservation
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomAustralia
In The Last Decade
Matthew N. Foster
8 papers receiving 237 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
- Ecology 145
- Global and Planetary Change 108
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 83
- Ecological Modeling 73
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 39
Countries citing papers authored by Matthew N. Foster
This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew N. Foster's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew N. Foster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew N. Foster more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew N. Foster
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew N. Foster. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew N. Foster. The network helps show where Matthew N. Foster may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Matthew N. Foster
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Matthew N. Foster. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Matthew N. Foster based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Matthew N. Foster. Matthew N. Foster is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 17 | |
| 2 | 51 | |
| 3 | 13 | |
| 4 | 81 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 69 | |
| 7 | Prioridades de conservación para el Escudo de Guayana : consenso 2002 | 2 |
| 8 | Conservation priorities for the Guayana Shield : 2002 consensus | 21 |
About Matthew N. Foster
Matthew N. Foster is a scholar working on Ecological Modeling, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Earth-Surface Processes, having authored 8 papers that have together received 255 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Species Distribution and Climate Change (3 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (2 papers) and Coleoptera: Cerambycidae studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (73 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (83 citations) and Ecology (145 citations). Matthew N. Foster has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Thomas M. Brooks, Naamal De Silva, David Rodríguez‐Rodríguez, Bastian Bomhard, Stuart H. M. Butchart, O. Huber, Adriano Pereira Paglia, Craig Hilton‐Taylor, Hao Wang and Jon Paul Rodrı́guez. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Biological Conservation and Biodiversity and Conservation.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.