Anna F. Probert

623 total citations
15 papers, 250 citations indexed

About

Anna F. Probert is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Ecological Modeling. According to data from OpenAlex, Anna F. Probert has authored 15 papers receiving a total of 250 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 7 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and 7 papers in Ecological Modeling. Recurrent topics in Anna F. Probert's work include Species Distribution and Climate Change (7 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (6 papers) and Plant and animal studies (5 papers). Anna F. Probert is often cited by papers focused on Species Distribution and Climate Change (7 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (6 papers) and Plant and animal studies (5 papers). Anna F. Probert collaborates with scholars based in Switzerland, South Africa and New Zealand. Anna F. Probert's co-authors include Sven Bacher, Giovanni Vimercati, Sabrina Kumschick, Christina J. Painting, Daniel J. Townsend, Gregory I. Holwell, Rudolf P. Rohr, Christian A. Kull, Ana Novoa and Darren Ward and has published in prestigious journals such as Scientific Reports, Conservation Biology and BioScience.

In The Last Decade

Anna F. Probert

14 papers receiving 248 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Anna F. Probert Switzerland 9 109 101 84 69 59 15 250
David A. Clarke Australia 8 119 1.1× 73 0.7× 60 0.7× 52 0.8× 51 0.9× 18 209
Ninad Avinash Mungi India 10 140 1.3× 159 1.6× 68 0.8× 74 1.1× 111 1.9× 24 310
Olaf Booy United Kingdom 7 197 1.8× 109 1.1× 93 1.1× 72 1.0× 121 2.1× 14 325
Eugenio Gervasini Italy 11 148 1.4× 62 0.6× 59 0.7× 107 1.6× 71 1.2× 25 299
William L. Harrower Canada 9 220 2.0× 153 1.5× 49 0.6× 64 0.9× 88 1.5× 24 326
Melissa A. Burt United States 4 140 1.3× 172 1.7× 99 1.2× 97 1.4× 68 1.2× 8 279
Lucas Lamelas-López Portugal 10 84 0.8× 66 0.7× 73 0.9× 40 0.6× 75 1.3× 31 208
Anna Gamero Czechia 9 175 1.6× 97 1.0× 110 1.3× 39 0.6× 46 0.8× 14 280
Francesco Cerasoli Italy 10 173 1.6× 85 0.8× 56 0.7× 56 0.8× 178 3.0× 23 291
Manette E. Sandor United States 8 102 0.9× 171 1.7× 124 1.5× 73 1.1× 55 0.9× 12 281

Countries citing papers authored by Anna F. Probert

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna F. Probert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna F. Probert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna F. Probert more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna F. Probert

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna F. Probert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna F. Probert. The network helps show where Anna F. Probert may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anna F. Probert

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anna F. Probert. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anna F. Probert based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anna F. Probert. Anna F. Probert is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
1.
Probert, Anna F., et al.. (2025). Using physiology to unravel the implications of heatwaves for big brown bats (Eptesicus fuscus). Journal of Experimental Biology. 228(20).
2.
Carneiro, Laís, Philip E. Hulme, Ross N. Cuthbert, et al.. (2024). Benefits do not balance costs of biological invasions. BioScience. 74(5). 340–344. 22 indexed citations
3.
Soto, Ismael, Phillip J. Haubrock, Ross N. Cuthbert, et al.. (2023). Monetary impacts should be considered in biological invasion risk assessments. Journal of Applied Ecology. 60(11). 2309–2313. 7 indexed citations
4.
Probert, Anna F., et al.. (2023). Clarification and guidance on the use of the Socio-Economic Impact Classification for Alien Taxa (SEICAT) framework. NeoBiota. 89. 45–70. 3 indexed citations
5.
Probert, Anna F., Daniel Wegmann, Tim Adriaens, et al.. (2022). Identifying, reducing, and communicating uncertainty in community science: a focus on alien species. Biological Invasions. 24(11). 3395–3421. 10 indexed citations
6.
Shackleton, Ross T., Giovanni Vimercati, Anna F. Probert, et al.. (2022). Consensus and controversy in the discipline of invasion science. Conservation Biology. 36(5). e13931–e13931. 26 indexed citations
7.
Vimercati, Giovanni, et al.. (2020). The importance of assessing positive and beneficial impacts of alien species. NeoBiota. 62. 525–545. 59 indexed citations
8.
Probert, Anna F., et al.. (2020). Invasion patterns of non-native ants in natural ecosystems in warm, temperate New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Ecology. 44(1). 2 indexed citations
9.
Rohr, Rudolf P., et al.. (2020). Functional similarity and dissimilarity facilitate alien plant invasiveness along biotic and abiotic gradients in an arid protected area. Biological Invasions. 22(6). 1997–2016. 24 indexed citations
10.
Probert, Anna F., Darren Ward, Jacqueline R. Beggs, et al.. (2020). High Dietary Niche Overlap Between Non-native and Native Ant Species in Natural Ecosystems. Environmental Entomology. 50(1). 86–96. 3 indexed citations
11.
Evans, Thomas, Tim M. Blackburn, Jonathan M. Jeschke, Anna F. Probert, & Sven Bacher. (2020). Application of the Socio-Economic Impact Classification for Alien Taxa (SEICAT) to a global assessment of alien bird impacts. NeoBiota. 62. 123–142. 16 indexed citations
12.
Probert, Anna F., et al.. (2020). Understanding uncertainty in the Impact Classification for Alien Taxa (ICAT) assessments. NeoBiota. 62. 387–405. 25 indexed citations
13.
Probert, Anna F., et al.. (2019). Conceptual Risk Framework: Integrating Ecological Risk of Introduced Species with Recipient Ecosystems. BioScience. 14 indexed citations
14.
Painting, Christina J., Anna F. Probert, Daniel J. Townsend, & Gregory I. Holwell. (2015). Multiple exaggerated weapon morphs: a novel form of male polymorphism in harvestmen. Scientific Reports. 5(1). 16368–16368. 37 indexed citations
15.
Taylor, Christopher K. & Anna F. Probert. (2014). Two new species of harvestmen (Opiliones, Eupnoi, Neopilionidae) from Waitomo, New Zealand. ZooKeys. 434(434). 37–45. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026