Matthew Lawrie
- Radiological and Ultrasound Technology top 1%
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty top 1%
- Medical Laboratory Technology top 1%
- Emergency Medical Services top 10%
- Strategy and Management
- Co-authors
- Dianne ParkerPatrick HudsonDarren M. AshcroftSusan E. KirkJane CartheyRobin BrydenHudson† Parker
- Topics
- Occupational Health and Safety Research (6 papers)Risk and Safety Analysis (5 papers)Quality and Safety in Healthcare (3 papers)
- Cited by
- Medical Laboratory TechnologyRadiological and Ultrasound TechnologyStatistics, Probability and Uncertainty
- Journals
- Safety ScienceClinical RiskResearch Explorer (The University of Manchester)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Matthew Lawrie
8 papers receiving 313 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
- Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 291
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 226
- Medical Laboratory Technology 107
- Emergency Medical Services 49
- Strategy and Management 47
Countries citing papers authored by Matthew Lawrie
This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew Lawrie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew Lawrie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew Lawrie more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew Lawrie
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew Lawrie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew Lawrie. The network helps show where Matthew Lawrie may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Matthew Lawrie
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Matthew Lawrie. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Matthew Lawrie based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Matthew Lawrie. Matthew Lawrie is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 9 | |
| 3 | 8 | |
| 4 | The Manchester Patient Safety Framework (MaPSaF). | 21 |
| 5 | Investigating employee perceptions of a framework of safety culture maturity. | 0 |
| 6 | 51 | |
| 7 | 250 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 9 |
About Matthew Lawrie
Matthew Lawrie is a scholar working on Medical Laboratory Technology, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, having authored 9 papers that have together received 353 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Occupational Health and Safety Research (6 papers), Risk and Safety Analysis (5 papers) and Quality and Safety in Healthcare (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Medical Laboratory Technology (107 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (291 citations) and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (226 citations). Matthew Lawrie has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Dianne Parker, Patrick Hudson, Darren M. Ashcroft, Susan E. Kirk, Jane Carthey, Robin Bryden, Hudson and † Parker. Their work appears in journals such as Safety Science, Clinical Risk and Research Explorer (The University of Manchester).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.