Clinical Risk

392 papers and 1.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 392 papers published in Clinical Risk in the last decades have received a total of 1.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Clinical Risk usually cover Pharmacy (110 papers), General Health Professions (74 papers) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (50 papers) specifically the topics of Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (110 papers), Patient Safety and Medication Errors (44 papers) and Healthcare Quality and Management (34 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Clinical Risk are James Watt, Charles Vincent, Sally Taylor‐Adams, Gale Pearson, David Oliver, Dominic Furniss, Leroy C Edozien, Nick Barber, Bryony Dean and Christian P Subbe.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Clinical Risk

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Clinical Risk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Clinical Risk.

Countries where authors publish in Clinical Risk

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Clinical Risk. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Clinical Risk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clinical Risk more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025