Matthew L. Condakes

957 total citations
8 papers, 758 citations indexed

About

Matthew L. Condakes is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Organic Chemistry and Rehabilitation. According to data from OpenAlex, Matthew L. Condakes has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 758 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Molecular Biology, 6 papers in Organic Chemistry and 4 papers in Rehabilitation. Recurrent topics in Matthew L. Condakes's work include Magnolia and Illicium research (4 papers), Plant-derived Lignans Synthesis and Bioactivity (4 papers) and Phytochemical compounds biological activities (3 papers). Matthew L. Condakes is often cited by papers focused on Magnolia and Illicium research (4 papers), Plant-derived Lignans Synthesis and Bioactivity (4 papers) and Phytochemical compounds biological activities (3 papers). Matthew L. Condakes collaborates with scholars based in United States. Matthew L. Condakes's co-authors include Thomas J. Maimone, Zachary G. Brill, Chi P. Ting, Kevin Hung, Stephen J. Harwood, Luiz F. T. Novaes, Takehiro Fukuzaki, Peter N. Carlsen, Xiang Zhou and Filip Szczypiński and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Chemical Reviews and Journal of the American Chemical Society.

In The Last Decade

Matthew L. Condakes

8 papers receiving 744 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Matthew L. Condakes United States 7 470 311 157 98 78 8 758
Qian‐Qian Yang China 15 409 0.9× 243 0.8× 38 0.2× 30 0.3× 25 0.3× 40 700
Hirofumi Yamamoto Japan 21 745 1.6× 297 1.0× 84 0.5× 64 0.7× 31 0.4× 61 1.1k
Praveen Kumar India 15 547 1.2× 241 0.8× 74 0.5× 26 0.3× 29 0.4× 50 837
Prathama S. Mainkar India 18 725 1.5× 272 0.9× 87 0.6× 60 0.6× 49 0.6× 95 964
Chen Qing China 20 303 0.6× 432 1.4× 217 1.4× 57 0.6× 55 0.7× 55 962
Yahya E. Jad Spain 18 430 0.9× 716 2.3× 156 1.0× 50 0.5× 9 0.1× 31 1.0k
Jutta Schulz Germany 14 292 0.6× 417 1.3× 66 0.4× 16 0.2× 117 1.5× 43 914
K. C. Nicolaou United States 8 849 1.8× 375 1.2× 226 1.4× 73 0.7× 30 0.4× 8 1.1k
Kenneth G. Hull United States 18 401 0.9× 396 1.3× 91 0.6× 66 0.7× 17 0.2× 41 788
Barbara Gerratana United States 16 226 0.5× 475 1.5× 212 1.4× 40 0.4× 42 0.5× 23 712

Countries citing papers authored by Matthew L. Condakes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew L. Condakes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew L. Condakes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew L. Condakes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew L. Condakes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew L. Condakes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew L. Condakes. The network helps show where Matthew L. Condakes may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Matthew L. Condakes

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Matthew L. Condakes. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Matthew L. Condakes based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Matthew L. Condakes. Matthew L. Condakes is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
1.
Condakes, Matthew L., et al.. (2021). Thermodynamic Understanding of an Aza-Michael Reaction Enables Five-Step Synthesis of the Potent Integrin Inhibitor MK-0429. The Journal of Organic Chemistry. 86(23). 17523–17527. 9 indexed citations
2.
Hung, Kevin, Matthew L. Condakes, Luiz F. T. Novaes, et al.. (2019). Development of a Terpene Feedstock-Based Oxidative Synthetic Approach to the Illicium Sesquiterpenes. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 141(7). 3083–3099. 80 indexed citations
3.
Condakes, Matthew L., Luiz F. T. Novaes, & Thomas J. Maimone. (2018). Contemporary Synthetic Strategies toward seco-Prezizaane Sesquiterpenes from Illicium Species. The Journal of Organic Chemistry. 83(24). 14843–14852. 29 indexed citations
4.
Condakes, Matthew L., et al.. (2018). A copper-catalyzed double coupling enables a 3-step synthesis of the quassinoid core architecture. Chemical Science. 10(3). 768–772. 4 indexed citations
5.
Brill, Zachary G., Matthew L. Condakes, Chi P. Ting, & Thomas J. Maimone. (2017). Navigating the Chiral Pool in the Total Synthesis of Complex Terpene Natural Products. Chemical Reviews. 117(18). 11753–11795. 253 indexed citations
6.
Condakes, Matthew L., Kevin Hung, Stephen J. Harwood, & Thomas J. Maimone. (2017). Total Syntheses of (−)-Majucin and (−)-Jiadifenoxolane A, Complex Majucin-Type Illicium Sesquiterpenes. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 139(49). 17783–17786. 47 indexed citations
7.
Hung, Kevin, et al.. (2016). Oxidative Entry into the Illicium Sesquiterpenes: Enantiospecific Synthesis of (+)-Pseudoanisatin. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 138(51). 16616–16619. 67 indexed citations
8.
Seiple, Ian B., Ziyang Zhang, Pavol Jakubec, et al.. (2016). A platform for the discovery of new macrolide antibiotics. Nature. 533(7603). 338–345. 269 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026