Daniel T. Hog
Impact in
- Organic Chemistry top 5%
- Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods
- Organoboron and organosilicon chemistry
- Catalytic Alkyne Reactions
- Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis
- Catalytic C–H Functionalization Methods
- Molecular Medicine top 10%
Papers in
-
- Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods 7
- Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis 4
- Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis 1
- Cyclopropane Reaction Mechanisms 1
-
- Marine Sponges and Natural Products 4
- Co-authors
- Martin Oestreich (1 shared paper)Dirk Trauner (5 shared papers)Péter Mayer (4 shared papers)Robert Webster (1 shared paper)Andrew G. Myers (2 shared papers)Ian B. Seiple (2 shared papers)Xiang Zhou (1 shared paper)Filip Szczypiński (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Synlett (2 papers)European Journal of Organic Chemistry (1 paper)Chemical Science (1 paper)The Journal of Physical Chemistry C (1 paper)Nature (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited StatesSpain
In The Last Decade
Daniel T. Hog
11 papers receiving 634 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
- Organic Chemistry 438
- Molecular Medicine 44
- Process Chemistry and Technology 24
- Biotechnology 72
- Pharmacology 107
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel T. Hog
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel T. Hog's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel T. Hog with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel T. Hog more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel T. Hog
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel T. Hog. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel T. Hog. The network helps show where Daniel T. Hog may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel T. Hog, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2016 | 269 | |
| 2 | 2009 | 99 | |
| 3 | 2010 | 79 | |
| 4 | 2012 | 59 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 32 | |
| 6 | 2012 | 31 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 26 | |
| 8 | 2014 | 22 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 17 | |
| 10 | 2014 | 10 | |
| 11 | 2015 | 5 |
About Daniel T. Hog
Daniel T. Hog is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Biotechnology, Pharmacology, Oncology and Molecular Biology, having authored 11 papers that have together received 649 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods (7 papers), Marine Sponges and Natural Products (4 papers), Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis (4 papers), Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (2 papers), Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (2 papers), Catalysts for Methane Reforming (1 paper), Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis (1 paper) and Cyclopropane Reaction Mechanisms (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Organic Chemistry (438 citations), Molecular Medicine (44 citations), Process Chemistry and Technology (24 citations), Biotechnology (72 citations) and Pharmacology (107 citations). Daniel T. Hog has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Martin Oestreich, Dirk Trauner, Péter Mayer, Robert Webster, Andrew G. Myers, Ian B. Seiple, Xiang Zhou, Filip Szczypiński, Peter N. Carlsen and Pavol Jakubec. Their work appears in journals such as Synlett, European Journal of Organic Chemistry, Chemical Science, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C and Nature.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.