Daniel T. Hog

802 total citations
11 papers, 649 citations indexed

About

Daniel T. Hog is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Biotechnology and Pharmacology. According to data from OpenAlex, Daniel T. Hog has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 649 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Organic Chemistry, 4 papers in Biotechnology and 2 papers in Pharmacology. Recurrent topics in Daniel T. Hog's work include Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods (7 papers), Marine Sponges and Natural Products (4 papers) and Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis (4 papers). Daniel T. Hog is often cited by papers focused on Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods (7 papers), Marine Sponges and Natural Products (4 papers) and Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis (4 papers). Daniel T. Hog collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United States and Spain. Daniel T. Hog's co-authors include Martin Oestreich, Dirk Trauner, Péter Mayer, Robert Webster, Ian B. Seiple, Andrew G. Myers, Pavol Jakubec, Ziyang Zhang, Filip Szczypiński and Peter M. C. Wright and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Angewandte Chemie International Edition and The Journal of Physical Chemistry C.

In The Last Decade

Daniel T. Hog

11 papers receiving 634 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Daniel T. Hog Germany 10 438 194 107 87 72 11 649
Verrill M. Norwood United States 12 592 1.4× 265 1.4× 91 0.9× 98 1.1× 35 0.5× 28 898
Matthew L. Condakes United States 7 470 1.1× 311 1.6× 157 1.5× 58 0.7× 98 1.4× 8 758
Kazuo Yabu Japan 8 601 1.4× 231 1.2× 76 0.7× 161 1.9× 28 0.4× 9 777
Chunrui Wu China 18 1.0k 2.4× 229 1.2× 76 0.7× 57 0.7× 27 0.4× 37 1.3k
Subramaniapillai Selva Ganesan India 16 498 1.1× 179 0.9× 79 0.7× 47 0.5× 19 0.3× 56 734
Cuixiang Sun United States 12 413 0.9× 162 0.8× 139 1.3× 51 0.6× 50 0.7× 17 624
Qian‐Qian Yang China 15 409 0.9× 243 1.3× 38 0.4× 53 0.6× 30 0.4× 40 700
Xavier Guinchard France 24 1.2k 2.7× 280 1.4× 73 0.7× 230 2.6× 91 1.3× 57 1.3k
Oreste A. Mascaretti Argentina 17 512 1.2× 379 2.0× 111 1.0× 58 0.7× 52 0.7× 51 809

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel T. Hog

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel T. Hog's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel T. Hog with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel T. Hog more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel T. Hog

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel T. Hog. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel T. Hog. The network helps show where Daniel T. Hog may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel T. Hog

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel T. Hog. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel T. Hog based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel T. Hog. Daniel T. Hog is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
1.
Hog, Daniel T., Alexander Sudau, Daniel Rackl, et al.. (2018). Late-Stage Sulfoximidation of Electron-Rich Arenes by Photoredox Catalysis. Synlett. 29(20). 2679–2684. 17 indexed citations
2.
Seiple, Ian B., Ziyang Zhang, Pavol Jakubec, et al.. (2016). A platform for the discovery of new macrolide antibiotics. Nature. 533(7603). 338–345. 269 indexed citations
3.
Hog, Daniel T., et al.. (2015). Evolution of a Unified Strategy for Complex Sesterterpenoids: Progress toward Astellatol and the Total Synthesis of (−)‐Nitidasin. Chemistry - A European Journal. 21(39). 13646–13665. 26 indexed citations
5.
Hog, Daniel T., et al.. (2014). The Total Synthesis of (−)‐Nitidasin. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 53(32). 8513–8517. 32 indexed citations
6.
Hog, Daniel T., et al.. (2014). Die Totalsynthese von (−)‐Nitidasin. Angewandte Chemie. 126(32). 8653–8657. 10 indexed citations
7.
Hugelshofer, Cedric L., Andreas Borgschulte, Elsa Callini, et al.. (2014). Gas–Solid Reaction of Carbon Dioxide with Alanates. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C. 118(29). 15940–15945. 22 indexed citations
8.
Hog, Daniel T., Robert Webster, & Dirk Trauner. (2012). Synthetic approaches toward sesterterpenoids. Natural Product Reports. 29(7). 752–752. 59 indexed citations
9.
Hog, Daniel T., Péter Mayer, & Dirk Trauner. (2012). A Unified Approach to trans-Hydrindane Sesterterpenoids. The Journal of Organic Chemistry. 77(13). 5838–5843. 31 indexed citations
10.
Perez-Galan, P., E. Herrero-Gómez, Daniel T. Hog, et al.. (2010). Mechanism of the gold-catalyzed cyclopropanation of alkenes with 1,6-enynes. Chemical Science. 2(1). 141–149. 79 indexed citations
11.
Hog, Daniel T. & Martin Oestreich. (2009). B(C6F5)3‐Catalyzed Reduction of Ketones and Imines Using Silicon‐Stereogenic Silanes: Stereoinduction by Single‐Point Binding. European Journal of Organic Chemistry. 2009(29). 5047–5056. 99 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026