Bret E. Huff
Impact in
- Organic Chemistry top 2%
- Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods
- Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis
- Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis
- Cyclopropane Reaction Mechanisms
- Catalytic C–H Functionalization Methods
- Synthesis of Tetrazole Derivatives
- Biochemistry top 5%
Papers in
-
- Bioactive Compounds and Antitumor Agents 2
-
- Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods 4
- Synthesis and Biological Evaluation 3
- Synthesis of Tetrazole Derivatives 2
- Co-authors
- Margaret M. FaulMichael A. StaszakAndrew M. RatzGeorge S. SheppardDavid A. EvansBruce H. LipshutzWayne VaccaroMichael E. LeTourneau
- Journals
- Tetrahedron Letters (7 papers)The Journal of Organic Chemistry (3 papers)Journal of the American Chemical Society (2 papers)The Journal of Antibiotics (1 paper)Tetrahedron (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Bret E. Huff
20 papers receiving 1.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
- Organic Chemistry 812
- Biochemistry 84
- Biotechnology 79
- Pharmacology 142
- Molecular Medicine 31
Countries citing papers authored by Bret E. Huff
This map shows the geographic impact of Bret E. Huff's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bret E. Huff with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bret E. Huff more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Bret E. Huff
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bret E. Huff. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bret E. Huff. The network helps show where Bret E. Huff may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Bret E. Huff, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2009 | 18 | |
| 2 | 2004 | 20 | |
| 3 | 2000 | 340 | |
| 4 | 2000 | 5 | |
| 5 | 1998 | 19 | |
| 6 | 1997 | 19 | |
| 7 | 1997 | 28 | |
| 8 | 1997 | 4 | |
| 9 | 1997 | 6 | |
| 10 | 1996 | 151 | |
| 11 | 1996 | 1 | |
| 12 | 1996 | 20 | |
| 13 | 1995 | 114 | |
| 14 | 1995 | 18 | |
| 15 | 1994 | 57 | |
| 16 | 1993 | 92 | |
| 17 | 1990 | 41 | |
| 18 | 1988 | 39 | |
| 19 | 1986 | 45 | |
| 20 | 1986 | 9 |
About Bret E. Huff
Bret E. Huff is a scholar working on Toxicology, Organic Chemistry, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Pharmacology and Pharmaceutical Science, having authored 20 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (4 papers), Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods (4 papers), Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (3 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Characterization (3 papers), Synthesis and Biological Evaluation (3 papers), Bioactive Compounds and Antitumor Agents (2 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (2 papers) and Synthesis of Tetrazole Derivatives (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organic Chemistry (812 citations), Biochemistry (84 citations), Biotechnology (79 citations), Pharmacology (142 citations) and Molecular Medicine (31 citations). Bret E. Huff has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Margaret M. Faul, Michael A. Staszak, Andrew M. Ratz, George S. Sheppard, David A. Evans, Bruce H. Lipshutz, Wayne Vaccaro, Michael E. LeTourneau, Stephen C. Wilkie and Thomas F. Butler. Their work appears in journals such as Tetrahedron Letters, The Journal of Organic Chemistry, Journal of the American Chemical Society, The Journal of Antibiotics and Tetrahedron.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.