Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Partial least squares for discrimination
20032.2k citationsMatthew L Barker et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Matthew L Barker
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew L Barker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew L Barker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew L Barker more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew L Barker
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew L Barker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew L Barker. The network helps show where Matthew L Barker may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Matthew L Barker
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Matthew L Barker.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Matthew L Barker based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Matthew L Barker. Matthew L Barker is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
He, Tao, Matthew L Barker, Aaron R Biesbrock, & Naresh Sharma. (2014). A randomized controlled clinical trial to assess the desensitizing effect of a stannous fluoride dentifrice.. PubMed. 27(2). 106–10.11 indexed citations
Harris, R. F., et al.. (2013). In vitro comparison of stannous fluoride, sodium fluoride, and sodium monofluorophosphate dentifrices in the prevention of enamel erosion.. PubMed. 24(3). 73–8.3 indexed citations
He, Tao, et al.. (2012). Assessment of the effects of a stannous fluoride dentifrice on gingivitis in a two-month positive-controlled clinical study.. PubMed. 23(3). 80–5.8 indexed citations
11.
Farmer, Steven A., et al.. (2011). Clinical comparison of plaque inhibition effects of a novel stabilized stannous fluoride dentifrice and a chlorhexidine digluconate dentifrice using digital plaque imaging.. PubMed. 22(5). 144–8.9 indexed citations
Bizhang, Mozhgan, Mario Müller, Jin‐Ho Phark, Matthew L Barker, & Robert W Gerlach. (2007). Clinical trial of long-term color stability of hydrogen peroxide strips and sodium percarbonate film.. PubMed. 20 Spec No A. 23A–27A.12 indexed citations
16.
Ferrari, Marco, Maria Crysanti Cagidiaco, Francesca Monticelli, et al.. (2007). Daytime use of a custom bleaching tray or whitening strips: initial and sustained color improvement.. PubMed. 20 Spec No A. 19A–22A.17 indexed citations
17.
Swift, Edward J., Patrícia A. Miguez, Matthew L Barker, & Robert W Gerlach. (2004). Three-week clinical trial of a 14% hydrogen-peroxide, strip-based bleaching system.. PubMed. 25(8 Suppl 2). 27–32.14 indexed citations
18.
Gerlach, Robert W, Paul A Sagel, Matthew L Barker, Katherine Karpinia, & Ingvar Magnusson. (2004). Placebo-controlled clinical trial evaluating a 10% hydrogen peroxide whitening strip.. PubMed. 15(4). 118–22.11 indexed citations
Mentzer, Robert M., Vladimir Birjiniuk, Shukri F. Khuri, et al.. (1999). Adenosine Myocardial Protection. Annals of Surgery. 229(5). 643–643.76 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.