Matthew K. Meisel

34 papers receiving 573 citations

Peers

Matthew K. Meisel
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Applied Psychology 171
  • Clinical Psychology 215
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 126
  • Epidemiology 240
  • Social Psychology 97
Replace Scott T. Wolf with:
Scott T. Wolf United States
Laura Oster‐Aaland United States
Rachel L. Bachrach United States
Rory A. Pfund United States
Evelien A. P. Poelen Netherlands
Sruti Desai United States
Dipali Venkataraman Rinker United States
Sander M. Bot Netherlands
Víctor Martínez‐Loredo Spain
Colleen Pilgrim United States
Matthew K. Meisel relative to Scott T. Wolf United States Scott T. Wolf's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Scott T. Wolf · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Matthew K. Meisel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew K. Meisel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew K. Meisel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew K. Meisel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew K. Meisel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew K. Meisel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew K. Meisel. The network helps show where Matthew K. Meisel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Matthew K. Meisel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Matthew K. Meisel Line = papers co-authored together Matthew K. Meisel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202162
2 201949
3 201546
4 201844
5 201744
6 201639
7 201536
8 201835
9 201534
10 201825
11 201424
12 201222
13 201720
14 201813
15 201813
16 201712
17 202111
18 201911
19 20218
20 20227

About Matthew K. Meisel

Matthew K. Meisel is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 36 papers that have together received 589 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (23 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (14 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (12 papers), Gambling Behavior and Treatments (6 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (4 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (4 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (4 papers) and Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (171 citations), Clinical Psychology (215 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (126 citations), Epidemiology (240 citations) and Social Psychology (97 citations). Matthew K. Meisel has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Cyprus. Frequent co-authors include Nancy P. Barnett, Adam S. Goodie, Graham DiGuiseppi, Miles Q. Ott, Shannon R. Kenney, Melissa A. Clark, W. Keith Campbell, Michelle Haikalis, Hannah Doucette and Melissa J. Cox. Their work appears in journals such as Addictive Behaviors, Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, BMC Psychology and Contemporary Clinical Trials.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact