Sarah A. Lust
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Epidemiology
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Applied Psychology top 5%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
- Co-authors
- Bruce D. BartholowErika A. HenryJ. Scott SaultsSarah L. TragesserPhillip K. WoodKate B. CareyMichael P. CareyMonica A. Riordan
- Topics
- Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (6 papers)Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (5 papers)Behavioral Health and Interventions (3 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Consulting and Clinical PsychologySocial Science & MedicineJournal of Abnormal Psychology
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanyBurundi
In The Last Decade
Sarah A. Lust
15 papers receiving 478 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
- Cognitive Neuroscience 276
- Epidemiology 122
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 121
- Applied Psychology 118
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 97
Countries citing papers authored by Sarah A. Lust
This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah A. Lust's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah A. Lust with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah A. Lust more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah A. Lust
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah A. Lust. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah A. Lust. The network helps show where Sarah A. Lust may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sarah A. Lust
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sarah A. Lust. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sarah A. Lust based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sarah A. Lust. Sarah A. Lust is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 17 | |
| 3 | 12 | |
| 4 | 12 | |
| 5 | 7 | |
| 6 | 27 | |
| 7 | 26 | |
| 8 | 27 | |
| 9 | 110 | |
| 10 | 26 | |
| 11 | 68 | |
| 12 | 46 | |
| 13 | 26 | |
| 14 | 64 | |
| 15 | 24 |
About Sarah A. Lust
Sarah A. Lust is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 15 papers that have together received 493 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (6 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (5 papers) and Behavioral Health and Interventions (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (118 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (276 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (121 citations). Sarah A. Lust has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Burundi. Frequent co-authors include Bruce D. Bartholow, Erika A. Henry, J. Scott Saults, Sarah L. Tragesser, Phillip K. Wood, Kate B. Carey, Michael P. Carey, Monica A. Riordan, Seth C. Kalichman and Angelo M. DiBello. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, Social Science & Medicine and Journal of Abnormal Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.