Matthew K. Berent
- Sociology and Political Science top 1%
- Social Psychology top 2%
- Political Science and International Relations top 2%
- Communication top 2%
- Applied Psychology top 2%
- Co-authors
- Jon A. KrosnickDavid Boningeret alAllyson L. HolbrookPenny S. VisserRaymond J. KoppMichael B. ConawayStanley Presser
- Topics
- Social and Intergroup Psychology (6 papers)Electoral Systems and Political Participation (4 papers)Survey Methodology and Nonresponse (2 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Personality and Social PsychologyAmerican Journal of Political SciencePublic Opinion Quarterly
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Matthew K. Berent
15 papers receiving 2.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 137
- Sociology and Political Science 1.4k
- Social Psychology 582
- Political Science and International Relations 340
- Communication 333
- Applied Psychology 307
Countries citing papers authored by Matthew K. Berent
This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew K. Berent's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew K. Berent with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew K. Berent more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew K. Berent
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew K. Berent. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew K. Berent. The network helps show where Matthew K. Berent may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Matthew K. Berent
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Matthew K. Berent. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Matthew K. Berent based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Matthew K. Berent. Matthew K. Berent is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 41 | |
| 2 | Measuring Voter Registration and Turnout in Surveys: Do Official Government Records Yield More Accurate Assessments? | 3 |
| 3 | 151 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 26 | |
| 6 | 375 | |
| 7 | 43 | |
| 8 | 221 | |
| 9 | The relation between political attitude importance and knowledge structure. | 13 |
| 10 | 218 | |
| 11 | 114 | |
| 12 | 19 | |
| 13 | 432 | |
| 14 | 399 | |
| 15 | 128 |
About Matthew K. Berent
Matthew K. Berent is a scholar working on Speech and Hearing, Sociology and Political Science and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 15 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (6 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (4 papers) and Survey Methodology and Nonresponse (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (307 citations), Communication (333 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (1.4k citations). Matthew K. Berent has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Jon A. Krosnick, David Boninger, et al, Allyson L. Holbrook, Penny S. Visser, Raymond J. Kopp, Michael B. Conaway, Stanley Presser, Leandre R. Fabrigar and W. Michael Hanemann. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, American Journal of Political Science and Public Opinion Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.