Matthew J. Petersen
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 5%
- Insect Science top 5%
- Ecology top 10%
- Ecological Modeling top 10%
- Plant Science
- Co-authors
- Megan E. O’RourkeGregory W. CourtneyMatthew A. BertoneBrian M. WiegmannDaniel C. PeckSujaya RaoAlfred BuschingerGengping Zhu
- Topics
- Diptera species taxonomy and behavior (11 papers)Insect and Pesticide Research (7 papers)Forensic Entomology and Diptera Studies (6 papers)
- Journals
- PLoS ONEProceedings of the Royal Society B Biological SciencesAgriculture Ecosystems & Environment
- Partner nations
- United StatesChinaGermany
In The Last Decade
Matthew J. Petersen
23 papers receiving 431 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 188
- Insect Science 172
- Ecology 135
- Ecological Modeling 66
- Plant Science 60
Countries citing papers authored by Matthew J. Petersen
This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew J. Petersen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew J. Petersen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew J. Petersen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew J. Petersen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew J. Petersen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew J. Petersen. The network helps show where Matthew J. Petersen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Matthew J. Petersen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Matthew J. Petersen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Matthew J. Petersen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Matthew J. Petersen. Matthew J. Petersen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 42 | |
| 5 | 20 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 47 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 37 | |
| 11 | 18 | |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 65 | |
| 15 | 69 | |
| 16 | 8 | |
| 17 | 16 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | New species and records of crane flies (Diptera, Tipuloidea) from Great Smoky Mountains National Park, Tennessee and North Carolina, U. S. A. | 4 |
| 20 | 14 |
About Matthew J. Petersen
Matthew J. Petersen is a scholar working on Insect Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Ecological Modeling, having authored 25 papers that have together received 448 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Diptera species taxonomy and behavior (11 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (7 papers) and Forensic Entomology and Diptera Studies (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (66 citations), Insect Science (172 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (188 citations). Matthew J. Petersen has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Megan E. O’Rourke, Gregory W. Courtney, Matthew A. Bertone, Brian M. Wiegmann, Daniel C. Peck, Sujaya Rao, Alfred Buschinger, Gengping Zhu, Wenjun Bu and Emily A. Martin. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences and Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.