This map shows the geographic impact of John C. Morse's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John C. Morse with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John C. Morse more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John C. Morse. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John C. Morse. The network helps show where John C. Morse may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John C. Morse
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John C. Morse.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John C. Morse based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with John C. Morse. John C. Morse is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Morse, John C., et al.. (2006). Females of the genus Ceraclea (Trichoptera: Leptoceridae) in North America: Taxonomy and classification. TigerPrints (Clemson University).3 indexed citations
9.
Morse, John C., et al.. (2001). Eastern Nearctic Rhyacophila species, with revision of the Rhyacophila invaria Group (Trichoptera: Rhyacophilidae). Transactions of the American Entomological Society. 127(1). 85–166.10 indexed citations
Yang, Lianfang & John C. Morse. (2000). Leptoceridae (Trichoptera) of the People’s Republic of China. TigerPrints (Clemson University).21 indexed citations
12.
Morse, John C., et al.. (1998). Larvae of the three common North American species of Phylocentropus (Trichoptera: Dipseudopsidae). Publication Server of Goethe University Frankfurt am Main (Goethe University Frankfurt). 12. 175–179.3 indexed citations
13.
Morse, John C., et al.. (1998). New taxonomic definition of the genus Neucentropus Martynov (Trichoptera: Polycentropodidae). Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington. 100(4). 665–671.4 indexed citations
14.
Morse, John C., et al.. (1997). Polyplectroptus species (Trichoptera: Polycentropodidae) from China, with consideration of their phylogeny. Insecta mundi. 11. 300–310.6 indexed citations
15.
Morse, John C., et al.. (1997). Tinodes species (Trichoptera: Psychomyiidae) from The People's Republic of China. Publication Server of Goethe University Frankfurt am Main (Goethe University Frankfurt). 11. 273–280.2 indexed citations
16.
Morse, John C., et al.. (1990). Descriptions of the females of three Polycentropus species (Trichoptera: Polycentropodidae). Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington. 92(2). 274–281.2 indexed citations
17.
Morse, John C., et al.. (1990). Unusual caddisfly (Trichoptera) fauna of Schoolhouse Springs, Louisiana, with description of a new species of Diplectrona (Hydropsychidae). Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington.3 indexed citations
18.
Morse, John C., et al.. (1989). Setodini of The People's Republic of China (Trichoptera: Leptoceridae, Leptocerinae).. TigerPrints (Clemson University). 25(4). 1–77.6 indexed citations
19.
Morse, John C., et al.. (1980). Aquatic Insects of Upper Three Runs Creek, Savannah River Plant, South Carolina. Part 1: Orders other than Diptera. TigerPrints (Clemson University).19 indexed citations
20.
Morse, John C., et al.. (1971). New species of Cheumatopsyche from the southeastern United States (Hydropsychidae, Trichoptera). Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington. 84. 301–306.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.