D. A. Crossley

10.2k total citations · 3 hit papers
149 papers, 6.7k citations indexed

About

D. A. Crossley is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Ecology and Insect Science. According to data from OpenAlex, D. A. Crossley has authored 149 papers receiving a total of 6.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 57 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 44 papers in Ecology and 43 papers in Insect Science. Recurrent topics in D. A. Crossley's work include Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (39 papers), Fire effects on ecosystems (25 papers) and Study of Mite Species (24 papers). D. A. Crossley is often cited by papers focused on Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (39 papers), Fire effects on ecosystems (25 papers) and Study of Mite Species (24 papers). D. A. Crossley collaborates with scholars based in United States, Puerto Rico and Brazil. D. A. Crossley's co-authors include David C. Coleman, Paul F. Hendrix, Wayne T. Swank, Timothy R. Seastedt, Robert W. Parmelee, Weixin Cheng, John M. Blair, Timothy D. Schowalter, Mike Beare and William W. Hargrove and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Ecology.

In The Last Decade

D. A. Crossley

145 papers receiving 5.7k citations

Hit Papers

Forest Hydrology and Ecology at Coweeta 1986 2026 1999 2012 1988 1986 1992 100 200 300 400

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
D. A. Crossley United States 43 2.5k 2.5k 1.9k 1.8k 1.7k 149 6.7k
O. W. Heal United Kingdom 28 3.1k 1.3× 2.9k 1.2× 1.6k 0.9× 1.9k 1.0× 1.5k 0.9× 76 7.3k
H. W. Hunt United States 33 2.5k 1.0× 1.8k 0.7× 983 0.5× 976 0.5× 1.7k 1.0× 61 4.9k
Jean‐François Ponge France 45 2.4k 1.0× 1.8k 0.7× 2.5k 1.3× 1.9k 1.0× 1.0k 0.6× 196 6.4k
John C. Moore United States 28 1.6k 0.7× 2.3k 0.9× 1.6k 0.8× 1.7k 0.9× 2.2k 1.3× 42 5.7k
Timothy R. Seastedt United States 54 3.0k 1.2× 4.7k 1.9× 2.1k 1.1× 4.4k 2.4× 2.4k 1.4× 174 10.9k
H.A. Verhoef Netherlands 33 1.5k 0.6× 1.8k 0.7× 1.6k 0.8× 1.1k 0.6× 1.2k 0.7× 76 4.5k
E. V. J. Tanner United Kingdom 43 2.0k 0.8× 1.8k 0.7× 1.3k 0.7× 2.6k 1.4× 1.2k 0.7× 63 6.1k
Dieter Mueller‐Dombois United States 33 1.4k 0.6× 3.9k 1.6× 3.2k 1.7× 5.6k 3.0× 3.5k 2.1× 113 11.1k
Shahid Naeem United States 16 1.2k 0.5× 3.7k 1.5× 2.6k 1.4× 4.9k 2.6× 2.2k 1.3× 25 9.7k
Paul F. Hendrix United States 43 4.8k 1.9× 2.5k 1.0× 2.4k 1.3× 802 0.4× 1.5k 0.9× 106 7.3k

Countries citing papers authored by D. A. Crossley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of D. A. Crossley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D. A. Crossley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D. A. Crossley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by D. A. Crossley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by D. A. Crossley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D. A. Crossley. The network helps show where D. A. Crossley may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of D. A. Crossley

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of D. A. Crossley. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of D. A. Crossley based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with D. A. Crossley. D. A. Crossley is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Holland, J. Nathaniel, Weixin Cheng, & D. A. Crossley. (1996). Herbivore-induced changes in plant carbon allocation: assessment of below-ground C fluxes using carbon-14. Oecologia. 107(1). 87–94. 243 indexed citations
3.
Coleman, David C., D. A. Crossley, & Eileen Ingham. (1994). Use of Sulfamethoxazole-Penicillin, Oxytetracycline, Carbofuran, Carbaryl, Naphthalene and Temik to Remove Key Organism Groups in Soil in a Corn Agroecosystem. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture. 4(3). 7–30. 12 indexed citations
4.
Crossley, D. A., David C. Coleman, Paul F. Hendrix, et al.. (1992). Modern Techniques in Soil Ecology. 1991. Soil Science. 154(5). 426–427. 3 indexed citations
5.
Coleman, David C., D. A. Crossley, Mike Beare, & Paul F. Hendrix. (1988). Interactions of organisms at root/soil and litter/ soil interfaces in terrestrial ecosystems. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment. 24(1-3). 117–134. 24 indexed citations
6.
Groffman, Peter M., Garfield J. House, Paul F. Hendrix, David E. Scott, & D. A. Crossley. (1986). Nitrogen Cycling as Affected by Interactions of Components in a Georgia Piedmont Agroecosystem. Ecology. 67(1). 80–87. 28 indexed citations
7.
House, Garfield J., Benjamin R. Stinner, D. A. Crossley, & E. P. Odum. (1984). Nitrogen Cycling in Conventional and No-Tillage Agro-Ecosystems: Analysis of Pathways and Processes. Journal of Applied Ecology. 21(3). 991–991. 40 indexed citations
8.
Swank, Wayne T., J. B. Waide, D. A. Crossley, & Robert L. Todd. (1981). Insect defoliation enhances nitrate export from forest ecosystems. Oecologia. 51(3). 297–299. 171 indexed citations
9.
Seastedt, Timothy R. & D. A. Crossley. (1981). Sodium Dynamics in Forest Ecosystems and the Animal Starvation Hypothesis. The American Naturalist. 117(6). 1029–1034. 27 indexed citations
10.
Seastedt, Timothy R., et al.. (1980). A simplified gelatine embedding technique for sectioning litter and soil samples. Pedobiologia. 20(1). 55–59. 5 indexed citations
11.
Best, G. Ronnie, et al.. (1978). Response of microarthropod populations to naphthalene in three contrasting habitats. Pedobiologia. 18(3). 189–201. 8 indexed citations
12.
Crossley, D. A., et al.. (1971). The Ingestion Rates of Microarthropods in Pine Mor, Estimated with Radioactive Calcium. Ecology. 52(3). 444–452. 19 indexed citations
13.
Crossley, D. A., et al.. (1971). Feeding by Caeculid Mites1 on Fungus Demonstrated with Radioactive Tracers2. Annals of the Entomological Society of America. 64(4). 760–762. 8 indexed citations
14.
Coulson, Robert N., et al.. (1971). Patterns of Coleoptera Species Diversity in Contrasting White Pine and Coppice Canopy Communities. The American Midland Naturalist. 86(1). 145–145. 4 indexed citations
15.
Crossley, D. A., David E. Reichle, & C. A. Edwards. (1971). Intake and turnover of radioactive cesium by earthworms (Lumbricidae). Pedobiologia. 11(1). 71–76. 20 indexed citations
16.
Crossley, D. A.. (1964). BIOLOGICAL ELIMINATION OF RADIONUCLIDES. 1 indexed citations
17.
Loomis, Richard B. & D. A. Crossley. (1963). New species and new records of chiggers (Acarina: Trombiculidae) from Texas. Acarologia. 5(3). 371–383. 19 indexed citations
18.
Strandtmann, R. W. & D. A. Crossley. (1962). A NEW SPECIES OF SOIL-INHABITING MITE, HYPOASPIS MARKSI. (Acarina, Laelaptidae). Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society. 1 indexed citations
19.
Crossley, D. A., et al.. (1961). Comparative Elimination of Radiocesium and Radiostrontium by Grasshoppers1. Annals of the Entomological Society of America. 54(3). 459–461. 4 indexed citations
20.
Crossley, D. A., et al.. (1960). Long‐Term Ecological Study in the Oak Ridge Area: III. The Oribatid Mite Fauna in Pine Litter. Ecology. 41(4). 628–638. 23 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026