Matthew Harger

574 total citations
8 papers, 401 citations indexed

About

Matthew Harger is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Condensed Matter Physics. According to data from OpenAlex, Matthew Harger has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 401 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Molecular Biology, 3 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and 1 paper in Condensed Matter Physics. Recurrent topics in Matthew Harger's work include Protein Structure and Dynamics (3 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (2 papers) and Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics (2 papers). Matthew Harger is often cited by papers focused on Protein Structure and Dynamics (3 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (2 papers) and Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics (2 papers). Matthew Harger collaborates with scholars based in United States, France and Egypt. Matthew Harger's co-authors include Pengyu Ren, Jay W. Ponder, Louis Lagardère, Jean‐Philip Piquemal, Kevin N. Dalby, Zhifeng Jing, Michael J. Schnieders, Luc-Henri Jolly, G. Andrés Cisneros and Félix Aviat and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature Communications, Journal of Computational Chemistry and Chemical Science.

In The Last Decade

Matthew Harger

8 papers receiving 400 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Matthew Harger United States 7 256 133 70 58 38 8 401
Sara Y. Cheng United States 8 280 1.1× 141 1.1× 108 1.5× 55 0.9× 37 1.0× 14 431
Maria T. Panteva United States 8 247 1.0× 128 1.0× 59 0.8× 47 0.8× 45 1.2× 8 366
Luc-Henri Jolly France 9 171 0.7× 135 1.0× 98 1.4× 44 0.8× 34 0.9× 12 360
Erika Balog Hungary 14 278 1.1× 127 1.0× 163 2.3× 55 0.9× 37 1.0× 22 456
Tihamér Geyer Germany 10 222 0.9× 150 1.1× 116 1.7× 44 0.8× 40 1.1× 27 408
Krystel El Hage France 15 284 1.1× 107 0.8× 104 1.5× 94 1.6× 66 1.7× 32 484
Alexei Nikitin Russia 9 168 0.7× 128 1.0× 63 0.9× 40 0.7× 41 1.1× 22 361
Prashant Kumar Gupta Israel 10 163 0.6× 81 0.6× 89 1.3× 65 1.1× 22 0.6× 23 355
Saumyak Mukherjee India 13 272 1.1× 132 1.0× 95 1.4× 51 0.9× 58 1.5× 23 454
Patrice Delarue France 14 287 1.1× 105 0.8× 139 2.0× 26 0.4× 45 1.2× 33 496

Countries citing papers authored by Matthew Harger

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew Harger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew Harger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew Harger more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew Harger

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew Harger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew Harger. The network helps show where Matthew Harger may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Matthew Harger

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Matthew Harger. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Matthew Harger based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Matthew Harger. Matthew Harger is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
1.
Liu, Chengwen, Zhifeng Jing, Juhoon Lee, et al.. (2023). Computational Investigation of a Series of Small Molecules as Potential Compounds for Lysyl Hydroxylase-2 (LH2) Inhibition. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling. 63(3). 986–1001. 8 indexed citations
2.
Kaoud, Tamer S., William Johnson, Nancy D. Ebelt, et al.. (2019). Modulating multi-functional ERK complexes by covalent targeting of a recruitment site in vivo. Nature Communications. 10(1). 5232–5232. 20 indexed citations
3.
Harger, Matthew & Pengyu Ren. (2019). Virial-based Berendsen barostat on GPUs using AMOEBA in Tinker-OpenMM. Results in Chemistry. 1. 100004–100004. 7 indexed citations
4.
Harger, Matthew, Ju‐Hyeon Lee, Brandon Walker, et al.. (2019). Computational insights into the binding of IN17 inhibitors to MELK. Journal of Molecular Modeling. 25(6). 151–151. 4 indexed citations
5.
Lagardère, Louis, Luc-Henri Jolly, Filippo Lipparini, et al.. (2017). Tinker-HP: a massively parallel molecular dynamics package for multiscale simulations of large complex systems with advanced point dipole polarizable force fields. Chemical Science. 9(4). 956–972. 173 indexed citations
6.
Harger, Matthew, Zhi Wang, Kevin N. Dalby, et al.. (2017). Tinker‐OpenMM: Absolute and relative alchemical free energies using AMOEBA on GPUs. Journal of Computational Chemistry. 38(23). 2047–2055. 88 indexed citations
7.
Zhang, Changsheng, David R. Bell, Matthew Harger, & Pengyu Ren. (2016). Polarizable Multipole-Based Force Field for Aromatic Molecules and Nucleobases. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation. 13(2). 666–678. 44 indexed citations
8.
Harger, Matthew, Casey R. Ager, David M. Zong, et al.. (2012). Expanding the Product Profile of a Microbial Alkane Biosynthetic Pathway. ACS Synthetic Biology. 2(1). 59–62. 57 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026