Matthew E. Layton

1.3k citations
48 papers · 867 indexed · h-index 17

Matthew E. Layton

48 papers receiving 836 citations

Peers

Matthew E. Layton
Comparison fields: 5 of 114
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 209
  • Pharmacology 89
  • Pharmacology 165
  • Biological Psychiatry 21
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 161
Replace Manabu Saito with:
Manabu Saito Japan
Ruth A. Duffy United States
Martin Siepmann Germany
Alain Nicolas France
Laura McWhirter United Kingdom
Bernhard J. Connemann Germany
Fang Dong China
Mauri J. Mattila Finland
Kristin J. Holm
Mona Darwish United States
Matthew E. Layton relative to Manabu Saito Japan Manabu Saito's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Manabu Saito · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Matthew E. Layton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew E. Layton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew E. Layton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew E. Layton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew E. Layton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew E. Layton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew E. Layton. The network helps show where Matthew E. Layton may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Matthew E. Layton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Matthew E. Layton Line = papers co-authored together Matthew E. Layton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20251
2 20238
3 20233
4 20224
5 202117
6 202014
7 201910
8 201911
9 201915
10 201820
11 20184
12 201676
13 20166
14 20154
15 20159
16 201222
17 199970
18 199914
19 199960
20 19979

About Matthew E. Layton

Matthew E. Layton is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Pharmacology, Nephrology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Biological Psychiatry, having authored 48 papers that have together received 867 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sleep and related disorders (10 papers), Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue (10 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (6 papers), Sleep and Wakefulness Research (5 papers), Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders (4 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (4 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (4 papers) and Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (209 citations), Pharmacology (89 citations), Pharmacology (165 citations), Biological Psychiatry (21 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (161 citations). Matthew E. Layton has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Hungary. Frequent co-authors include Stephen R. Dager, Hans P. A. Van Dongen, Wayne Strauss, Thomas L. Pazdernik, Seth D. Friedman, Fred Samson, Samantha M. Riedy, Todd L. Richards, Sterling McPherson and John R. White. Their work appears in journals such as Chronobiology International, American Journal of Psychiatry, Neurochemical Research, Clinical and Translational Science and Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026