Matthew E. Fewel
Impact in
- Neurology top 5%
- Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
- Neurosurgical Procedures and Complications
- Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
- Hematology top 10%
- Hemophilia Treatment and Research
- Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
Papers in
-
- Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research 3
- Neurosurgical Procedures and Complications 3
- Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances 2
-
- Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms 3
- Hemophilia Treatment and Research 2
- Co-authors
- B. Gregory Thompson (3 shared papers)Julian T. Hoff (3 shared papers)Hugh Garton (2 shared papers)Paul Park (2 shared papers)Michael L. Levy (1 shared paper)Gordon McComb (1 shared paper)Richard F. Keep (3 shared papers)Ya Hua (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Neurocritical Care (2 papers)Neurosurgical FOCUS (1 paper)Journal of Neurosurgery Pediatrics (1 paper)Neurosurgery (1 paper)Pediatric Neurosurgery (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesFrance
In The Last Decade
Matthew E. Fewel
8 papers receiving 465 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
- Neurology 258
- Hematology 118
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 143
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 29
- Internal Medicine 21
Countries citing papers authored by Matthew E. Fewel
This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew E. Fewel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew E. Fewel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew E. Fewel more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew E. Fewel
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew E. Fewel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew E. Fewel. The network helps show where Matthew E. Fewel may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 14 scholars most cited alongside Matthew E. Fewel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2003 | 113 | |
| 2 | 2003 | 105 | |
| 3 | 1996 | 80 | |
| 4 | 2004 | 53 | |
| 5 | 2004 | 45 | |
| 6 | 2005 | 39 | |
| 7 | 2004 | 27 | |
| 8 | 2005 | 16 |
About Matthew E. Fewel
Matthew E. Fewel is a scholar working on Neurology, Hematology, Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, having authored 8 papers that have together received 478 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms (3 papers), Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research (3 papers), Neurosurgical Procedures and Complications (3 papers), Hemophilia Treatment and Research (2 papers), Signaling Pathways in Disease (2 papers), S100 Proteins and Annexins (2 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (2 papers) and Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (258 citations), Hematology (118 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (143 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (29 citations) and Internal Medicine (21 citations). Matthew E. Fewel has collaborated with scholars based in United States and France. Frequent co-authors include B. Gregory Thompson, Julian T. Hoff, Hugh Garton, Paul Park, Michael L. Levy, Gordon McComb, Richard F. Keep, Ya Hua, Guohua Xi and Lingling Tang. Their work appears in journals such as Neurocritical Care, Neurosurgical FOCUS, Journal of Neurosurgery Pediatrics, Neurosurgery and Pediatric Neurosurgery.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.