Matthew E. Craig

18 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Matthew E. Craig's Hit Papers

Fast-decaying plant litter enhances soil carbon in temperate forests but not through microbial physiological traits 2022 · 206 citations
2060+1+3Years since publication100200300400

Peers

Matthew E. Craig
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Soil Science 775
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 258
  • Insect Science 231
  • Ecology 423
  • Environmental Chemistry 118
Replace Xueyong Pang with:
Xueyong Pang China
Yeming You China
Minhuang Wang China
Ashley D. Keiser United States
Naili Zhang China
Chengming You China
Yuanhu Shao China
Mengguang Han China
Ziliang Zhang China
Guoyong Yan China
Matthew E. Craig relative to Xueyong Pang China Xueyong Pang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Xueyong Pang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Matthew E. Craig

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew E. Craig's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew E. Craig with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew E. Craig more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew E. Craig

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew E. Craig. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew E. Craig. The network helps show where Matthew E. Craig may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Matthew E. Craig, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Matthew E. Craig Line = papers co-authored together Matthew E. Craig links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1
A trade-off between plant and soil carbon storage under elevated CO2
Hit paper breakdown →
2021429
2
Fast-decaying plant litter enhances soil carbon in temperate forests but not through microbial physiological traits
Hit paper breakdown →
2022206
3 2018183
4 2021117
5 202160
6 202054
7 201440
8 201534
9 201728
10 202125
11 202319
12 201915
13 202514
14 20254
15 20242
16 20252
17 20231
18 20241
19 20240

About Matthew E. Craig

Matthew E. Craig is a scholar working on Soil Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Insect Science and Plant Science, having authored 19 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (16 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (7 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (5 papers), Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (4 papers), Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology (4 papers), Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics (3 papers), Soil and Unsaturated Flow (2 papers) and Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Soil Science (775 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (258 citations), Insect Science (231 citations), Ecology (423 citations) and Environmental Chemistry (118 citations). Matthew E. Craig has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and China. Frequent co-authors include Richard P. Phillips, Chao Liang, Edward Brzostek, Joshua B. Fisher, Benjamin N. Sulman, Benjamin L. Turner, Keith Clay, Daniel J. Johnson, Katilyn V. Beidler and A. Stuart Grandy. Their work appears in journals such as Global Change Biology, Biogeochemistry, New Phytologist, Ecology and Plants People Planet.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact