Scott M. Pearson

2.7k total citations
49 papers, 1.9k citations indexed

About

Scott M. Pearson is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology and Global and Planetary Change. According to data from OpenAlex, Scott M. Pearson has authored 49 papers receiving a total of 1.9k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 27 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 21 papers in Ecology and 17 papers in Global and Planetary Change. Recurrent topics in Scott M. Pearson's work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (27 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (9 papers) and Plant and animal studies (9 papers). Scott M. Pearson is often cited by papers focused on Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (27 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (9 papers) and Plant and animal studies (9 papers). Scott M. Pearson collaborates with scholars based in United States, New Zealand and Canada. Scott M. Pearson's co-authors include Monica G. Turner, Jennifer M. Fraterrigo, Virginia H. Dale, Robert V. O’Neill, Rose A. Graves, Philip M. Dixon, David N. Wear, Paul V. Bolstad, Anthony R. Ives and Linda L. Wallace and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Ecology and Journal of Ecology.

In The Last Decade

Scott M. Pearson

49 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Scott M. Pearson United States 24 942 881 731 440 262 49 1.9k
Andrea B. Pfisterer Switzerland 8 1.4k 1.5× 877 1.0× 1.0k 1.4× 691 1.6× 244 0.9× 8 2.5k
Miguel N. Bugalho Portugal 25 767 0.8× 755 0.9× 911 1.2× 221 0.5× 149 0.6× 66 2.0k
Daniel Montoya Spain 19 1.0k 1.1× 698 0.8× 717 1.0× 624 1.4× 316 1.2× 35 2.0k
Marion Pfeifer United Kingdom 27 950 1.0× 888 1.0× 1.1k 1.5× 406 0.9× 323 1.2× 68 2.3k
Pedro Martins da Silva Portugal 19 991 1.1× 734 0.8× 901 1.2× 668 1.5× 294 1.1× 40 2.3k
Sari C. Saunders Canada 17 1.4k 1.5× 1.1k 1.2× 1.4k 1.9× 499 1.1× 339 1.3× 29 2.8k
James D. M. Speed Norway 28 855 0.9× 1.0k 1.2× 610 0.8× 301 0.7× 399 1.5× 119 2.1k
Leonie E. Valentine Australia 24 880 0.9× 1.3k 1.4× 1.0k 1.4× 300 0.7× 415 1.6× 76 2.4k
Kevin M. Potter United States 28 966 1.0× 785 0.9× 735 1.0× 383 0.9× 398 1.5× 87 2.0k
Josh Dorrough Australia 22 1.5k 1.6× 1.1k 1.3× 785 1.1× 480 1.1× 350 1.3× 57 2.4k

Countries citing papers authored by Scott M. Pearson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Scott M. Pearson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott M. Pearson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott M. Pearson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Scott M. Pearson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott M. Pearson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott M. Pearson. The network helps show where Scott M. Pearson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Scott M. Pearson

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Scott M. Pearson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Scott M. Pearson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Scott M. Pearson. Scott M. Pearson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
McCain, Christy M., et al.. (2024). Disturbance and diversity: Lichen species richness decreases with increasing anthropogenic disturbance. Biological Conservation. 293. 110598–110598. 5 indexed citations
2.
Graves, Rose A., Scott M. Pearson, & Monica G. Turner. (2018). Effects of bird community dynamics on the seasonal distribution of cultural ecosystem services. AMBIO. 48(3). 280–292. 24 indexed citations
3.
Graves, Rose A., Scott M. Pearson, & Monica G. Turner. (2017). Species richness alone does not predict cultural ecosystem service value. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 114(14). 3774–3779. 93 indexed citations
4.
Pearson, Scott M., et al.. (2013). Effects of Exurban Development and Temperature on Bird Species in the Southern Appalachians. Conservation Biology. 27(5). 1069–1078. 21 indexed citations
5.
Pearson, Scott M., et al.. (2012). Effects of Climate and Exurban Development on Nest Predation and Predator Presence in the southern Appalachian Mountains (U.S.A.). Conservation Biology. 26(4). 679–688. 16 indexed citations
6.
Anderson, Dean P., et al.. (2012). Predicting Microstegium vimineum invasion in natural plant communities of the southern Blue Ridge Mountains, USA. Biological Invasions. 15(6). 1217–1230. 14 indexed citations
7.
Clark, James S., David M. Bell, Chengjin Chu, et al.. (2010). High‐dimensional coexistence based on individual variation: a synthesis of evidence. Ecological Monographs. 80(4). 569–608. 129 indexed citations
9.
Fraterrigo, Jennifer M., Scott M. Pearson, & Monica G. Turner. (2009). The response of understory herbaceous plants to nitrogen fertilization in forests of different land-use history. Forest Ecology and Management. 257(10). 2182–2188. 17 indexed citations
10.
Fraterrigo, Jennifer M., Monica G. Turner, & Scott M. Pearson. (2005). Previous land use alters plant allocation and growth in forest herbs. Journal of Ecology. 0(0). 294883905–???. 1 indexed citations
11.
Pearson, Scott M., et al.. (2001). A new technique in dendroecology using Callitris.. 12. 39–47. 3 indexed citations
12.
Simons, Theodore R., Scott M. Pearson, & Frank R. Moore. (2000). Application of spatial models to the stopover ecology of trans-gulf migrants. Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida). 4–14. 33 indexed citations
13.
Pearson, Scott M. & Kenneth A. Rose. (2000). The effects of sampling design on estimating the magnitude and distribution of contaminated sediments in a large reservoir. Environmetrics. 12(1). 81–102. 3 indexed citations
14.
Pearson, Scott M., et al.. (1998). Forest Patch Size, Land Use, and Mesic Forest Herbs in the French Broad River Basin, North Carolina. Castanea. 63(3). 382–395. 35 indexed citations
15.
Dale, Virginia H., et al.. (1995). Effects of forest fragmentation on neotropical fauna: current research and data availability. Environmental Reviews. 3(2). 191–211. 73 indexed citations
16.
Pearson, Scott M.. (1994). Landscape-level processes and wetland conservation in the Southern Appalachian Mountains. Water Air & Soil Pollution. 77(3-4). 321–332. 16 indexed citations
17.
Dale, Virginia H., et al.. (1994). Relating Patterns of Land‐Use Change to Faunal Biodiversity in the Central Amazon. Conservation Biology. 8(4). 1027–1036. 157 indexed citations
18.
Pearson, Scott M.. (1993). Understanding the impacts of forest fragmentation in the Southern Appalachian Mountains. University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas). 1 indexed citations
19.
Pearson, Scott M.. (1993). The spatial extent and relative influence of landscape-level factors on wintering bird populations. Landscape Ecology. 8(1). 3–18. 157 indexed citations
20.
Pearson, Scott M., et al.. (1992). Wood Stork Use of Wetland Habitats around Cumberland Island, Georgia. Colonial Waterbirds. 15(1). 33–33. 7 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026