Matthew B. Stone
Impact in
- Biophysics top 2%
- Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques
- Structural Biology top 5%
Papers in
-
- RNA Interference and Gene Delivery 3
- Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior 2
- Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques 2
-
- Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques 6
- Cell Image Analysis Techniques 2
- Co-authors
- Sarah L. Veatch (8 shared papers)Sarah A. Shelby (3 shared papers)Tyson R. Shepherd (2 shared papers)Rémi Veneziano (2 shared papers)Mark Bathe (2 shared papers)Eike‐Christian Wamhoff (2 shared papers)Kathleen Wisser (1 shared paper)William R. Schief (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Biophysical Journal (2 papers)Nature Communications (1 paper)eLife (1 paper)Chemical Communications (1 paper)ChemPhysChem (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSwedenBulgaria
In The Last Decade
Matthew B. Stone
11 papers receiving 947 citations
Matthew B. Stone's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
- Biophysics 118
- Structural Biology 29
- Molecular Biology 623
- Immunology 148
- Biomedical Engineering 225
Countries citing papers authored by Matthew B. Stone
This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew B. Stone's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew B. Stone with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew B. Stone more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew B. Stone
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew B. Stone. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew B. Stone. The network helps show where Matthew B. Stone may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Matthew B. Stone, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Role of nanoscale antigen organization on B-cell activation probed using DNA origami Hit paper breakdown → | 2020 | 321 |
| 2 | 2010 | 167 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 164 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 137 | |
| 5 | 2015 | 55 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 54 | |
| 7 | 2014 | 23 | |
| 8 | 2013 | 21 | |
| 9 | 2017 | 12 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 2 | |
| 11 | 2013 | 1 |
About Matthew B. Stone
Matthew B. Stone is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Biophysics, Immunology, Organic Chemistry and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 11 papers that have together received 957 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques (6 papers), RNA Interference and Gene Delivery (3 papers), Immunotherapy and Immune Responses (2 papers), Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior (2 papers), Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (2 papers), Cell Image Analysis Techniques (2 papers), Click Chemistry and Applications (1 paper) and Fullerene Chemistry and Applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biophysics (118 citations), Structural Biology (29 citations), Molecular Biology (623 citations), Immunology (148 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (225 citations). Matthew B. Stone has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Sweden and Bulgaria. Frequent co-authors include Sarah L. Veatch, Sarah A. Shelby, Tyson R. Shepherd, Rémi Veneziano, Mark Bathe, Eike‐Christian Wamhoff, Kathleen Wisser, William R. Schief, Jayajit Das and Tyson J. Moyer. Their work appears in journals such as Biophysical Journal, Nature Communications, eLife, Chemical Communications and ChemPhysChem.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.