Matthew A. Schenker
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 2%
- Instrumentation top 2%
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics top 10%
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Co-authors
- Richard S. EllisDaniel P. StarkJ. S. DunlopSteven R. FurlanettoMasami OuchiMichele CirasuoloYoshiaki OnoS. Charlot
- Topics
- Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (6 papers)Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (4 papers)Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (3 papers)
- Journals
- The Astrophysical JournalThe Astrophysical Journal Supplement SeriesThe Astrophysical Journal Letters
- Partner nations
- United StatesFranceUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Matthew A. Schenker
6 papers receiving 841 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 29
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 849
- Instrumentation 406
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 149
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering 74
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 60
Countries citing papers authored by Matthew A. Schenker
This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew A. Schenker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew A. Schenker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew A. Schenker more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew A. Schenker
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew A. Schenker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew A. Schenker. The network helps show where Matthew A. Schenker may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Matthew A. Schenker
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Matthew A. Schenker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Matthew A. Schenker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Matthew A. Schenker. Matthew A. Schenker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | EVOLUTION OF THE SIZES OF GALAXIES OVER 7 < z < 12 REVEALED BY THE 2012 HUBBLE ULTRA DEEP FIELD CAMPAIGN | 57 |
| 2 | 76 | |
| 3 | NEW CONSTRAINTS ON COSMIC REIONIZATION FROM THE 2012 HUBBLE ULTRA DEEP FIELD CAMPAIGNbreakdown → | 340 |
| 4 | 40 | |
| 5 | 88 | |
| 6 | 265 |
About Matthew A. Schenker
Matthew A. Schenker is a scholar working on Instrumentation, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Nuclear and High Energy Physics, having authored 6 papers that have together received 866 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (6 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (4 papers) and Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Instrumentation (406 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (849 citations) and Nuclear and High Energy Physics (149 citations). Matthew A. Schenker has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Richard S. Ellis, Daniel P. Stark, J. S. Dunlop, Steven R. Furlanetto, Masami Ouchi, Michele Cirasuolo, Yoshiaki Ono, S. Charlot, Alexander B. Rogers and Brant Robertson. Their work appears in journals such as The Astrophysical Journal, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series and The Astrophysical Journal Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.