Emma Curtis-Lake

28 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Hit Papers

NEW CONSTRAINTS ON COSMIC REIONIZATION FROM THE 2012 HUBB...20132026201720212013100200300

Peers

Emma Curtis-Lake
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 1.4k
  • Instrumentation 738
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 194
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 92
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 83
Replace Alexander B. Rogers with:
Alexander B. Rogers United Kingdom
Nimish P. Hathi United States
Xianzhong Zheng China
Swara Ravindranath United States
Göran Östlin Sweden
Renske Smit United Kingdom
Takatoshi Shibuya Japan
Carrie Bridge United States
Michael V. Maseda Netherlands
Alaina Henry United States
Emma Curtis-Lake relative to Alexander B. Rogers United Kingdom Alexander B. Rogers's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Alexander B. Rogers · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emma Curtis-Lake

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Curtis-Lake's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Curtis-Lake with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Curtis-Lake more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Curtis-Lake

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Curtis-Lake. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Curtis-Lake. The network helps show where Emma Curtis-Lake may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emma Curtis-Lake

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emma Curtis-Lake. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emma Curtis-Lake based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emma Curtis-Lake. Emma Curtis-Lake is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 0
2 1
3 3
4 6
5 6
6 0
7 3
8 5
9 20
10 2
11 49
12 11
13
14
14 1
15 22
16 0
17
17
18
EVOLUTION OF THE SIZES OF GALAXIES OVER 7 < z < 12 REVEALED BY THE 2012 HUBBLE ULTRA DEEP FIELD CAMPAIGN
57
19 51
20 76

About Emma Curtis-Lake

Emma Curtis-Lake is a scholar working on Instrumentation, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Nuclear and High Energy Physics, having authored 32 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (28 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (20 papers) and Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Instrumentation (738 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (1.4k citations) and Nuclear and High Energy Physics (194 citations). Emma Curtis-Lake has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include J. S. Dunlop, S. Charlot, R. J. McLure, Anton M. Koekemoer, Alexander B. Rogers, R. A. A. Bowler, Brant Robertson, Daniel P. Stark, Masami Ouchi and Evan E. Schneider. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, The Astrophysical Journal and Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026