Matteo Lotito

728 total citations
9 papers, 289 citations indexed

About

Matteo Lotito is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Geometry and Topology. According to data from OpenAlex, Matteo Lotito has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 289 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 3 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics and 3 papers in Geometry and Topology. Recurrent topics in Matteo Lotito's work include Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (8 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (3 papers) and Algebraic structures and combinatorial models (3 papers). Matteo Lotito is often cited by papers focused on Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (8 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (3 papers) and Algebraic structures and combinatorial models (3 papers). Matteo Lotito collaborates with scholars based in United States, South Korea and United Kingdom. Matteo Lotito's co-authors include Mario Martone, Philip C. Argyres, Yongchao Lü, Ben Heidenreich, Wolfgang Altmannshofer, Joshua Eby, Stefania Gori, Douglas Tuckler and Iñaki García‐Etxebarria and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of High Energy Physics, Physical review. D and Bulletin of the American Physical Society.

In The Last Decade

Matteo Lotito

9 papers receiving 283 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Matteo Lotito United States	8	259	106	65	55	44	9	289
Yongchao Lü United States	7	223 0.9×	114 1.1×	63 1.0×	45 0.8×	45 1.0×	8	264
Oscar Chacaltana United States	6	345 1.3×	158 1.5×	140 2.2×	67 1.2×	46 1.0×	7	385
Daisuke Yokoyama Japan	7	260 1.0×	83 0.8×	97 1.5×	104 1.9×	39 0.9×	14	277
Sam Espahbodi United States	4	137 0.5×	106 1.0×	54 0.8×	19 0.3×	35 0.8×	4	179
Futoshi Yagi Japan	11	331 1.3×	124 1.2×	114 1.8×	105 1.9×	36 0.8×	23	351
Katrin Wendland Germany	6	112 0.4×	107 1.0×	61 0.9×	21 0.4×	65 1.5×	14	164
Johan Källén Sweden	6	216 0.8×	75 0.7×	90 1.4×	84 1.5×	17 0.4×	9	229
Bert Schellekens Netherlands	5	243 0.9×	34 0.3×	42 0.6×	101 1.8×	14 0.3×	6	265
Du Pei United States	7	92 0.4×	115 1.1×	47 0.7×	8 0.1×	65 1.5×	10	158
Øyvind Tafjord United States	5	325 1.3×	31 0.3×	151 2.3×	236 4.3×	12 0.3×	9	336

Countries citing papers authored by Matteo Lotito

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Matteo Lotito's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matteo Lotito with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matteo Lotito more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Matteo Lotito

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matteo Lotito. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matteo Lotito. The network helps show where Matteo Lotito may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Matteo Lotito

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Matteo Lotito. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Matteo Lotito based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Matteo Lotito. Matteo Lotito is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

Heidenreich, Ben & Matteo Lotito. (2025). Proving the Weak Gravity Conjecture in perturbative string theory. Part I. The bosonic string. Journal of High Energy Physics. 2025(5). 7 indexed citations

Argyres, Philip C., et al.. (2023). Vertex algebra of extended operators in 4d N=2 superconformal field theories. Part I. Journal of High Energy Physics. 2023(10). 1 indexed citations

García‐Etxebarria, Iñaki, et al.. (2022). Deconfining $$ \mathcal{N} $$ = 2 SCFTs or the art of brane bending. Journal of High Energy Physics. 2022(3). 13 indexed citations

Argyres, Philip C., Matteo Lotito, Yongchao Lü, & Mario Martone. (2018). Geometric constraints on the space of N=2 SCFTs. Part III: enhanced Coulomb branches and central charges. Journal of High Energy Physics. 2018(2). 52 indexed citations

Argyres, Philip C., Matteo Lotito, Yongchao Lü, & Mario Martone. (2018). Geometric constraints on the space of N $$ \mathcal{N} $$ = 2 SCFTs. Part II: construction of special Kähler geometries and RG flows. Journal of High Energy Physics. 2018(2). 50 indexed citations

Argyres, Philip C., Matteo Lotito, Yongchao Lü, & Mario Martone. (2018). Geometric constraints on the space of N $$ \mathcal{N} $$ = 2 SCFTs. Part I: physical constraints on relevant deformations. Journal of High Energy Physics. 2018(2). 66 indexed citations

Lotito, Matteo, Philip C. Argyres, Yongchao Lü, & Mario Martone. (2017). Geometric constraints on the space of N=2 SCFTs. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 2017. 13 indexed citations

Argyres, Philip C., Matteo Lotito, Yongchao Lü, & Mario Martone. (2016). Expanding the landscape of N $$ \mathcal{N} $$ = 2 rank 1 SCFTs. Journal of High Energy Physics. 2016(5). 52 indexed citations

Altmannshofer, Wolfgang, Joshua Eby, Stefania Gori, et al.. (2016). Collider signatures of flavorful Higgs bosons. Physical review. D. 94(11). 35 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact