Matteo Lotito
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics top 5%
- Geometry and Topology top 5%
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics top 10%
- Astronomy and Astrophysics
- Mathematical Physics top 10%
- Co-authors
- Mario MartonePhilip C. ArgyresYongchao LüBen HeidenreichJoshua EbyStefania GoriDouglas TucklerWolfgang Altmannshofer
- Topics
- Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (8 papers)Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (3 papers)Algebraic structures and combinatorial models (3 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of High Energy PhysicsPhysical review. DBulletin of the American Physical Society
- Partner nations
- United StatesSouth KoreaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Matteo Lotito
9 papers receiving 283 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 17
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 259
- Geometry and Topology 106
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 65
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 55
- Mathematical Physics 44
Countries citing papers authored by Matteo Lotito
This map shows the geographic impact of Matteo Lotito's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matteo Lotito with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matteo Lotito more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Matteo Lotito
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matteo Lotito. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matteo Lotito. The network helps show where Matteo Lotito may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Matteo Lotito
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Matteo Lotito. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Matteo Lotito based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Matteo Lotito. Matteo Lotito is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 13 | |
| 4 | 52 | |
| 5 | 66 | |
| 6 | 50 | |
| 7 | Geometric constraints on the space of N=2 SCFTs | 13 |
| 8 | 52 | |
| 9 | 35 |
About Matteo Lotito
Matteo Lotito is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Geometry and Topology and Astronomy and Astrophysics, having authored 9 papers that have together received 289 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (8 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (3 papers) and Algebraic structures and combinatorial models (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (259 citations), Geometry and Topology (106 citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (65 citations). Matteo Lotito has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Korea and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Mario Martone, Philip C. Argyres, Yongchao Lü, Ben Heidenreich, Joshua Eby, Stefania Gori, Douglas Tuckler, Wolfgang Altmannshofer and Iñaki García‐Etxebarria. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of High Energy Physics, Physical review. D and Bulletin of the American Physical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.