Danielle R. Schwartz

452 total citations
5 papers, 269 citations indexed

About

Danielle R. Schwartz is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Danielle R. Schwartz has authored 5 papers receiving a total of 269 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in Social Psychology, 3 papers in Clinical Psychology and 2 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Danielle R. Schwartz's work include Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (2 papers), LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (2 papers) and Sexual function and dysfunction studies (1 paper). Danielle R. Schwartz is often cited by papers focused on Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (2 papers), LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (2 papers) and Sexual function and dysfunction studies (1 paper). Danielle R. Schwartz collaborates with scholars based in Canada and United States. Danielle R. Schwartz's co-authors include Colleen E. Carney, Trevor Hart, Peter Bieling, Lance L. Hawley, Kathleen Corcoran, Julie Irving, Norman A. S. Farb, Adam K. Anderson, Zindel V. Segal and Mona Loutfy and has published in prestigious journals such as Clinical Psychology Review, Cognitive Therapy and Research and Cognitive and Behavioral Practice.

In The Last Decade

Danielle R. Schwartz

5 papers receiving 261 citations

Peers

Danielle R. Schwartz
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 141
  • Clinical Psychology 131
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 69
  • Social Psychology 68
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 37
Replace Radhika Reddy with:
Radhika Reddy United States
B. Quyen United States
Stephanie L. Allen Canada
Jennifer D. Slane United States
Stephanie Jarvi Steele United States
Nicole Nadine Lønfeldt Denmark
Kamelia Harris United Kingdom
Sara M. Stasik-O’Brien United States
Laura Fischer United States
Carmen Adornetto Switzerland
Radhika Reddy United States View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Danielle R. Schwartz
Danielle R. Schwartz · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Danielle R. Schwartz
Danielle R. Schwartz · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Danielle R. Schwartz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Danielle R. Schwartz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Danielle R. Schwartz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Danielle R. Schwartz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Danielle R. Schwartz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Danielle R. Schwartz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Danielle R. Schwartz. The network helps show where Danielle R. Schwartz may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Danielle R. Schwartz

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Danielle R. Schwartz. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Danielle R. Schwartz based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Danielle R. Schwartz. Danielle R. Schwartz is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026