Matt Houlbrook
Impact in
- History top 0.5%
- Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes
- French Historical and Cultural Studies
- Gender Studies top 10%
- Feminism, Gender, and Sexuality Studies
Papers in
-
- European history and politics 10
-
- Historical Gender and Feminism Studies 5
- Irish and British Studies 2
- Co-authors
- Yvonne Jewkes (2 shared papers)Dominique Moran (2 shared papers)Michaela Mahlberg (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- History Workshop Journal (3 papers)Past & Present (1 paper)The Journal of Modern History (1 paper)The American Historical Review (1 paper)Journal of Urban History (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Matt Houlbrook
23 papers receiving 244 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
- History 223
- Gender Studies 66
- Museology 20
- Sociology and Political Science 225
- Literature and Literary Theory 44
Countries citing papers authored by Matt Houlbrook
This map shows the geographic impact of Matt Houlbrook's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matt Houlbrook with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matt Houlbrook more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Matt Houlbrook
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matt Houlbrook. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matt Houlbrook. The network helps show where Matt Houlbrook may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 3 scholars most cited alongside Matt Houlbrook, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2005 | 104 | |
| 2 | 2006 | 89 | |
| 3 | 2006 | 23 | |
| 4 | 2003 | 21 | |
| 5 | 2007 | 21 | |
| 6 | 2010 | 17 | |
| 7 | Prince of Tricksters: The Incredible True Story of Netley Lucas, Gentleman Crook | 2016 | 14 |
| 8 | 2000 | 11 | |
| 9 | 2006 | 11 | |
| 10 | 2001 | 10 | |
| 11 | 2012 | 9 | |
| 12 | 2013 | 9 | |
| 13 | 2002 | 8 | |
| 14 | 2015 | 8 | |
| 15 | 2013 | 6 | |
| 16 | 2013 | 5 | |
| 17 | 2022 | 5 | |
| 18 | 2005 | 4 | |
| 19 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 20 | 2023 | 2 |
About Matt Houlbrook
Matt Houlbrook is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, History, Literature and Literary Theory and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 25 papers that have together received 384 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include European history and politics (10 papers), Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (10 papers), Historical Gender and Feminism Studies (5 papers), French Historical and Cultural Studies (4 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (3 papers), Irish and British Studies (2 papers), Literature: history, themes, analysis (2 papers) and Feminism, Gender, and Sexuality Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History (223 citations), Gender Studies (66 citations), Museology (20 citations), Sociology and Political Science (225 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (44 citations). Matt Houlbrook has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Yvonne Jewkes, Dominique Moran and Michaela Mahlberg. Their work appears in journals such as History Workshop Journal, Past & Present, The Journal of Modern History, The American Historical Review and Journal of Urban History.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.