Mathijs Peters

540 citations
15 papers · 375 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

Mathijs Peters

12 papers receiving 365 citations

Peers

Mathijs Peters
Comparison fields: 5 of 36
  • Condensed Matter Physics 237
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 323
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 16
  • Artificial Intelligence 29
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 16
Replace Eytan Grosfeld with:
Eytan Grosfeld Israel
Puneet A. Murthy Germany
J. J. Kinnunen Finland
W. J. Elion Netherlands
Nayana Shah United States
Ville Pietilä Finland
A. I. Toropov Russia
P. D. Ye United States
W. Apel Germany
Sarah Al-Assam United Kingdom
Mathijs Peters relative to Eytan Grosfeld Israel Eytan Grosfeld's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Eytan Grosfeld · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mathijs Peters

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mathijs Peters's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mathijs Peters with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mathijs Peters more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mathijs Peters

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mathijs Peters. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mathijs Peters. The network helps show where Mathijs Peters may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Mathijs Peters, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mathijs Peters Line = papers co-authored together Mathijs Peters links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 1989182
2 1990119
3 199428
4 199923
5 199810
6 20143
7
Erich Fromm on Resonance and Alienation
20162
8 20222
9 20132
10 20171
11 20201
12 19991
13 20241
14 19890
15 20200

About Mathijs Peters

Mathijs Peters is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Condensed Matter Physics, Philosophy, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 15 papers that have together received 375 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Quantum and electron transport phenomena (5 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (3 papers), Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design (3 papers), Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices (2 papers), Semiconductor materials and devices (2 papers), Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel (2 papers), Kierkegaardian Philosophy and Influence (1 paper) and Philosophical Ethics and Theory (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (237 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (323 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (16 citations), Artificial Intelligence (29 citations) and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (16 citations). Mathijs Peters has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include L.J. Geerligs, J. E. Mooij, A. H. Verbruggen, B. J. van Wees, Gerd Schön, Rosario Fazio, J. I. Dijkhuis, L. W. Molenkamp, Thad Walker and J. D. Tobiason. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, Journal of Applied Physics, Journal for European Environmental & Planning Law, Semiconductor Science and Technology and European Journal of Philosophy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact