Mathieu Hoyrup

800 citations
23 papers · 231 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Mathieu Hoyrup

23 papers receiving 210 citations

Peers

Mathieu Hoyrup
Comparison fields: 5 of 25
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 210
  • Mathematical Physics 88
  • Geometry and Topology 62
  • Statistics and Probability 47
  • Artificial Intelligence 55
Replace A. J. Ellis with:
A. J. Ellis United Kingdom
Eliran Subag Israel
Elizabeth Meckes United States
Alvaro Arias United States
Jing‐Cheng Liu China
Gary Weiss United States
Michael Rathjen United Kingdom
Hiroyuki Osaka Japan
Johan F. Aarnes Norway
Maria Gordina United States
Mathieu Hoyrup relative to A. J. Ellis United Kingdom A. J. Ellis's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×18×
A. J. Ellis · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mathieu Hoyrup

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mathieu Hoyrup's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mathieu Hoyrup with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mathieu Hoyrup more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mathieu Hoyrup

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mathieu Hoyrup. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mathieu Hoyrup. The network helps show where Mathieu Hoyrup may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Mathieu Hoyrup, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mathieu Hoyrup Line = papers co-authored together Mathieu Hoyrup links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200954
2 200924
3 201119
4 201019
5 201119
6 201018
7 200914
8 20099
9 20129
10 20128
11 20146
12 20116
13 20075
14 20125
15 20234
16 20152
17 20082
18 20172
19 20162
20
Algorithmically random points in measure preserving systems, statistical behaviour, complexity and entropy
20081

About Mathieu Hoyrup

Mathieu Hoyrup is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Mathematical Physics, Geometry and Topology, Artificial Intelligence and Statistics and Probability, having authored 23 papers that have together received 231 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms (23 papers), Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals (16 papers), Advanced Topology and Set Theory (8 papers), Cellular Automata and Applications (4 papers), semigroups and automata theory (4 papers), Logic, programming, and type systems (3 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (3 papers) and Topological and Geometric Data Analysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Theory and Mathematics (210 citations), Mathematical Physics (88 citations), Geometry and Topology (62 citations), Statistics and Probability (47 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (55 citations). Mathieu Hoyrup has collaborated with scholars based in France, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Cristóbal Rojas, Stefano Galatolo, Péter Gács, Laurent Bienvenu, Alexander Shen, Klaus Weihrauch, Walid Gomaa, Takayuki Kihara, Umile Giuseppe Longo and Victor Selivanov. Their work appears in journals such as Theoretical Computer Science, Theory of Computing Systems, Information and Computation, Journal of Symbolic Logic and Journal of Complexity.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact