Mathieu Gallay

544 citations
7 papers · 402 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Mathieu Gallay

7 papers receiving 392 citations

Peers

Mathieu Gallay
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 305
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 199
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 63
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 80
  • Clinical Psychology 69
Replace Julie Markant with:
Julie Markant United States
Mélanie Perron Canada
Susanne Schmidt Germany
Lizann Bonnar United Kingdom
Angela Hayden United States
Shigeru Mukaida Japan
Tanja S. H. Wingenbach United Kingdom
Brett DeSchepper United States
Nadine Kloth Australia
David M Widders United States
Mathieu Gallay relative to Julie Markant United States Julie Markant's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Julie Markant · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mathieu Gallay

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mathieu Gallay's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mathieu Gallay with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mathieu Gallay more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mathieu Gallay

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mathieu Gallay. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mathieu Gallay. The network helps show where Mathieu Gallay may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Mathieu Gallay, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mathieu Gallay Line = papers co-authored together Mathieu Gallay links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

7 of 7 papers shown

About Mathieu Gallay

Mathieu Gallay is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Automotive Engineering and Social Psychology, having authored 7 papers that have together received 402 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Face Recognition and Perception (6 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (5 papers), Face recognition and analysis (5 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (1 paper), Emotions and Moral Behavior (1 paper), Smart Parking Systems Research (1 paper), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (1 paper) and Spatial Cognition and Navigation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (305 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (199 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (63 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (80 citations) and Clinical Psychology (69 citations). Mathieu Gallay has collaborated with scholars based in France. Frequent co-authors include Jean‐Yves Baudouin, Karine Durand, Fabrice Robichon, Alix Seigneuric, Roger Lécuyer, C. Lemoine, Brian F. G. Katz, Bernard Oriola, Christophe Jouffrais and Simon J. Thorpe. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, Child Development, Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance, Visual Cognition and Technology and Disability.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact