Julian Seddon

989 total citations
23 papers, 701 citations indexed

About

Julian Seddon is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology and Global and Planetary Change. According to data from OpenAlex, Julian Seddon has authored 23 papers receiving a total of 701 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 14 papers in Ecology and 8 papers in Global and Planetary Change. Recurrent topics in Julian Seddon's work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (12 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (7 papers) and Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (5 papers). Julian Seddon is often cited by papers focused on Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (12 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (7 papers) and Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (5 papers). Julian Seddon collaborates with scholars based in Australia, Ireland and United States. Julian Seddon's co-authors include Sue Briggs, David B. Lindenmayer, Phil Gibbons, Adrian D. Manning, Joern Fischer, Paul Ryan, G. W. Barrett, Philip Gibbons, J. D. Schade and Nancy B. Grimm and has published in prestigious journals such as Ecology, Conservation Biology and Biological Conservation.

In The Last Decade

Julian Seddon

23 papers receiving 653 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Julian Seddon Australia 13 352 340 282 93 83 23 701
Annett Baasch Germany 13 415 1.2× 288 0.8× 145 0.5× 43 0.5× 73 0.9× 19 601
Mateus Dantas de Paula Germany 14 447 1.3× 272 0.8× 540 1.9× 89 1.0× 35 0.4× 22 849
Jenny Langridge Australia 5 574 1.6× 334 1.0× 348 1.2× 139 1.5× 63 0.8× 5 936
Thomas J. Brandeis United States 16 432 1.2× 209 0.6× 479 1.7× 71 0.8× 18 0.2× 44 777
Thomas Cordonnier France 20 664 1.9× 199 0.6× 801 2.8× 52 0.6× 70 0.8× 51 1.1k
Margaret J. Stern United States 9 496 1.4× 204 0.6× 580 2.1× 57 0.6× 18 0.2× 13 954
Francis Isselin‐Nondedeu France 16 221 0.6× 495 1.5× 331 1.2× 127 1.4× 103 1.2× 38 818
Robert W. Eager Australia 11 406 1.2× 541 1.6× 531 1.9× 89 1.0× 140 1.7× 12 933
M. A. Scaranello Brazil 8 342 1.0× 189 0.6× 289 1.0× 35 0.4× 27 0.3× 10 590
John W. Willoughby United States 4 310 0.9× 410 1.2× 169 0.6× 82 0.9× 52 0.6× 6 623

Countries citing papers authored by Julian Seddon

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julian Seddon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julian Seddon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julian Seddon more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julian Seddon

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julian Seddon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julian Seddon. The network helps show where Julian Seddon may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Julian Seddon

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Julian Seddon. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Julian Seddon based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Julian Seddon. Julian Seddon is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Cary, Geoffrey J., et al.. (2018). A comparison of fuel hazard in recently burned and long-unburned forests and woodlands. International Journal of Wildland Fire. 27(9). 609–622. 23 indexed citations
2.
Sato, Chloe F., Jeff T. Wood, John Stein, et al.. (2016). Natural tree regeneration in agricultural landscapes: The implications of intensification. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment. 230. 98–104. 21 indexed citations
3.
Ikin, Karen, et al.. (2016). Evaluating complementary networks of restoration plantings for landscape‐scale occurrence of temporally dynamic species. Conservation Biology. 30(5). 1027–1037. 12 indexed citations
4.
Seddon, Julian, et al.. (2011). Assessing vegetation condition in temperate montane grasslands. Ecological Management & Restoration. 12(2). 141–144. 3 indexed citations
5.
Seddon, Julian, et al.. (2010). Linking site and regional scales of biodiversity assessment for delivery of conservation incentive payments. Conservation Letters. 3(6). 415–424. 6 indexed citations
6.
Seddon, Julian, Sue Briggs, Micah Davies, et al.. (2010). Comparing Regional Biodiversity Benefits of Investment Strategies for Land-Use Change. Geographical Research. 49(2). 132–152. 5 indexed citations
7.
Seddon, Julian, et al.. (2009). Managing catchments for multiple objectives: the implications of land use change for salinity, biodiversity and economics. Animal Production Science. 49(10). 852–859. 10 indexed citations
8.
Zerger, André, Philip Gibbons, Julian Seddon, Sue Briggs, & David Freudenberger. (2009). A method for predicting native vegetation condition at regional scales. Landscape and Urban Planning. 91(2). 65–77. 22 indexed citations
9.
Seddon, Julian, et al.. (2009). Biodiversity benefits of alley farming with old man saltbush in central western New South Wales. Animal Production Science. 49(10). 860–868. 13 indexed citations
10.
Gibbons, Phil, David B. Lindenmayer, Joern Fischer, et al.. (2008). The Future of Scattered Trees in Agricultural Landscapes. Conservation Biology. 22(5). 1309–1319. 214 indexed citations
11.
Gibbons, Phillip B., et al.. (2008). An operational method to assess impacts of land clearing on terrestrial biodiversity. Ecological Indicators. 9(1). 26–40. 70 indexed citations
12.
Briggs, Sue, et al.. (2008). Condition of fenced and unfenced remnant vegetation in inland catchments in south-eastern Australia. Australian Journal of Botany. 56(7). 590–599. 32 indexed citations
13.
Gibbons, Philip, Sue Briggs, Julian Seddon, et al.. (2008). Rapidly quantifying reference conditions in modified landscapes. Biological Conservation. 141(10). 2483–2493. 71 indexed citations
14.
Zerger, André, Garth Warren, M. P. Austin, Philip Gibbons, & Julian Seddon. (2007). Implications of scale change on native vegetation condition mapping. ANU Open Research (Australian National University). 1 indexed citations
15.
Briggs, Sue, et al.. (2007). Structures of bird communities in woodland remnants in central New South Wales, Australia. Australian Journal of Zoology. 55(1). 29–40. 14 indexed citations
16.
Seddon, Julian, et al.. (2007). The extent of dryland salinity in remnant woodland and forest within an agricultural landscape. Australian Journal of Botany. 55(5). 533–540. 8 indexed citations
17.
Zerger, André, Philip Gibbons, Simon Jones, et al.. (2006). Spatially modelling native vegetation condition. Ecological Management & Restoration. 7(s1). 11 indexed citations
18.
Seddon, Julian, et al.. (2003). Relationships between bird species and characteristics of woodland remnants in central New South Wales. Pacific Conservation Biology. 9(2). 95–119. 42 indexed citations
19.
Schade, J. D., S. G. Fisher, Nancy B. Grimm, & Julian Seddon. (2001). THE INFLUENCE OF A RIPARIAN SHRUB ON NITROGEN CYCLING IN A SONORAN DESERT STREAM. Ecology. 82(12). 3363–3376. 82 indexed citations
20.
Schade, J. D., S. G. Fisher, Nancy B. Grimm, & Julian Seddon. (2001). The Influence of a Riparian Shrub on Nitrogen Cycling in a Sonoran Desert Stream. Ecology. 82(12). 3363–3363. 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026